Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Effect of radiochemotherapy on T2* MRI in HNSCC and its relation to FMISO PET derived hypoxia and FDG PET

  • 1, 4, 5Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 1, 4, 5,
  • 1, 3, 4, 5,
  • 1, 4, 5,
  • 1, 4, 5,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3, 4, 5,
  • 1, 4, 5,
  • 6,
  • 3, 4, 5,
  • 3, 4, 5,
  • 2, 4, 5,
  • 2, 4, 5 and
  • 1, 4, 5
Radiation Oncology201813:159

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1103-1

  • Received: 6 June 2018
  • Accepted: 17 August 2018
  • Published:

The Correction to this article has been published in Radiation Oncology 2018 13:183

Abstract

Background

To assess the effect of radiochemotherapy (RCT) on proposed tumour hypoxia marker transverse relaxation time (T2*) and to analyse the relation between T2* and 18F-misonidazole PET/CT (FMISO-PET) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (FDG-PET).

Methods

Ten patients undergoing definitive RCT for squamous cell head-and-neck cancer (HNSCC) received repeat FMISO- and 3 Tesla T2*-weighted MRI at weeks 0, 2 and 5 during treatment and FDG-PET at baseline. Gross tumour volumes (GTV) of tumour (T), lymph nodes (LN) and hypoxic subvolumes (HSV, based on FMISO-PET) and complementary non-hypoxic subvolumes (nonHSV) were generated. Mean values for T2* and SUVmean FDG were determined.

Results

During RCT, marked reduction of tumour hypoxia on FMISO-PET was observed (T, LN), while mean T2* did not change significantly. At baseline, mean T2* values within HSV-T (15 ± 5 ms) were smaller compared to nonHSV-T (18 ± 3 ms; p = 0.051), whereas FDG SUVmean (12 ± 6) was significantly higher for HSV-T (12 ± 6) than for nonHSV-T (6 ± 3; p = 0.026) and higher for HSV-LN (10 ± 4) than for nonHSV-LN (5 ± 2; p ≤ 0.011). Correlation between FMISO PET and FDG PET was higher than between FMSIO PET and T2* (R2 for GTV-T (FMISO/FDG) = 0.81, R2 for GTV-T (FMISO/T2*) = 0.32).

Conclusions

Marked reduction of tumour hypoxia between week 0, 2 and 5 found on FMISO PET was not accompanied by a significant T2*change within GTVs over time. These results suggest a relation between tumour oxygenation status and T2* at baseline, but no simple correlation over time. Therefore, caution is warranted when using T2* as a substitute for FMISO-PET to monitor tumour hypoxia during RCT in HNSCC patients.

Trial registration

DRKS, DRKS00003830 . Registered 23.04.2012.

Keywords

  • Tumour hypoxia
  • T2*
  • Multiparametric MRI
  • FMISO PET
  • FDG PET
  • HNSCC

Background

In squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) assessment of the extent of tumour hypoxia under primary radiochemotherapy (RCT) is warranted to obtain an early prognostic marker and to define potential dose escalation volumes [114]. Positron emission tomography (PET) can be considered the gold standard method for hypoxia imaging using hypoxia-associated tracers such as [18F]-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) and [18F]-fluoroazomycinarabinoside (FAZA) [1518]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to characterize tumour function in several ways: Gadolinium(Gd)-perfusion MRI analyzes the tumour perfusion using the dynamic signal change after contrast medium injection, while Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) MRI aims at assessing oxygen consumption. The MRI apparent transverse relaxation time T2*, respectively its reciprocal the relaxation rate R2*, obtained from T2*-weighted MRI, have been proposed as a potential imaging biomarker and surrogate for hypoxia PET [1934]. A change in regional concentration of oxy- vs. deoxyhaemoglobin can result in a change in magnetic field homogeneity, which is leading to a signal change in T2*-weighted MR acquisitions.

In the literature, controversial findings are reported for T2* at baseline and during RCT: T2*-weighted MRI has recently been compared to FMISO-PET in glioma patients [32] where it provided complementary information rather than spatial correlation. In cervix cancer patients Kim et al. studied BOLD MRI before and after RCT, and they report a correlation between tumour R2* pre-RCT with tumour size response but not with tumour volume response [29]. Li et al. identified tumour R2* before RCT as a significant prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival [30]. In HNSCC patients undergoing RCT, Panek et al. examined T2* signal stability and reproducibility pre-RCT, and they found that T2* measurements are highly reproducible [23]. Min et al. and Wong et al. evaluated serial functional imaging including R2*/T2*-weighted MRI in HNSCC during RCT and found no clear pattern for changes in R2* [33, 34].

Here, we assessed hypoxia by analyzing T2* as a measure of the deoxyhaemoglobin concentration and used T2-weighted sequences and Gd-contrast enhanced T1 sequences for morphological characterization and delineation of tumours and lymph node metastasis. The aim of our study was to examine the effect of RCT on T2* in HNSCC at an early and late time point during RCT and to analyse the relation between T2* and FMISO-PET. Serial imaging was scheduled before RCT and at week 2 and week 5 during RCT. Baseline 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT (FDG-PET) was included to optimize pretherapy staging and considered for image analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to combine T2*-weighted MRI with FMISO-PET in HNSCC.

Methods

Patients, imaging schedule and treatment

Thirty two patients (T2–4 N+) were enrolled for this prospective functional MRI and hypoxia PET/CT imaging study during definitive RCT for HNSCC. Patients were recruited from 08/2014 to 11/2015. RCT was administered for 7 weeks in daily fractions of 2 Gy to a total dose of 70 Gy to the primary tumour and macroscopic lymph node metastases and 50 Gy to the elective lymphatic drainage. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered once in weeks 1, 4, and 7 with cisplatin (100 mg/kg/d or adjusted to lower dose) or carboplatin in case of chronic renal insufficiency.

Patients underwent serial FMISO-PET as previously described [7, 8] and MRI in weeks 0, 2 and 5. FDG-PET was conducted in week 0. From the total patient cohort, 10 patients (Additional file 1: Table S1) met inclusion criteria for functional MRI image analysis, i.e. imaging with repeat 3 Tesla MRI and presence of a complete set of serial FMISO-PET data.

PET/CT imaging

[18F]-FMISO and [18F]-FDG production met standard quality criteria (tracer synthesis: Euro-PET GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). All patients received an injection of 243–332 MBq (6.6–9.0 mCi) 18F-MISO and of 303–471 MBq (8.2–12.7 mCi) 18F-FDG, respectively. In case of 18F-FDG whole body PET/CT scans were performed 1 h p.i. (2 min per bed position, 288 × 288 matrix) with contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT (120 keV, 100–250 mAs, dose modulation, 600 mm data collection diameter, 512 × 512 matrix) and 2 mm slice thickness from the base of the skull to the proximal femur (Gemini TF Big Bore, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, USA). A subsequent low-dose PET/CT scan was performed in one bed position (10 min) covering the head and neck region. Static 18F-MISO PET/CT was executed in one bed position (20 min) covering the head and neck region 160 min p.i., following our previous study [7]. PET data were corrected for scatter, attenuation, randoms and decay and expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV; i.e. local radioactivity concentration normalized to injected dose per body weight). Head and neck FDG SUV images were normalized to mean uptake in normal tissue, defined as spherical volume within the contralateral sternocleidomastoid muscle.

MRI imaging and calculation of T2* parameter maps

As part of a multi-parameter MR imaging protocol consisting of T1w-MRI, T2w-MRI, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE-MRI) perfusion measurements and diffusion weighted measurements (DWI-MRI), and multi-echo fast spoiled gradient echo (FLASH) data were acquired on a clinical 3 Tesla MRI system (Tim Trio, Siemens). For this, patients were positioned on the MR system table in the MR-compatible immobilization mask, an anterior 4-element flexible radiofrequency receiver coil (Flex Loop Large) was wrapped around the head-and-neck region, and data were acquired in combination with the posterior spine coil elements within the patient table to maximize the local signal-to-noise ratio at the tumour. The multi-echo acquisition for T2* measurements was acquired prior to the DCE measurements, and imaging slices were defined in transverse orientation. The following imaging parameters were used: 22 slices, spatial resolution: 3 (slice thickness) × 1.1 × 1.1 mm3, matrix size: 2562, 12 echoes, monopolar readout gradients, echo times TE = 4.83–33.0 ms, echo spacing ΔTE = 2.55 ms, repetition time TR = 400 ms, flip angle α = 60°, readout bandwidth = 815 Hz/pixel, total acquisition time = 1:42 min:s.

From the multi-echo FLASH image series, a T2* map was calculated for each slice position by a pixel-wise mono-exponential (S(TE) = S0 exp.(−TE/T2*)) fit to the signal. To avoid noise bias, signal intensities in later echoes that were smaller than 5 times the noise level were not used for fitting.

For all image acquisitions (FDG-PET, FMISO-PET, MRI) patients were immobilized identical to the radiation position with individually casted head and neck masks.

Contouring and image analysis

Image data were transferred to iplan net planning software (BrainLAB) and co-registered. The GTV for primary tumour (GTV-T) and pathological lymph nodes (GTV-LN) for weeks 0, 2, and 5 were contoured within MRI images based on contrast-enhanced T1w-MRI Gd (Gadolinium) and T2 sequences as consensus volumes between a board certified radiologist and radiation oncologist. At week 0, the FDG-PET additional information was considered for GTV contouring. A representative normal tissue volume (NT) was contoured as a sphere within the contralateral sternocleidomastoid muscle. Hypoxic tumour subvolumes (HSV-T), hypoxic lymph node subvolumes (HSV-LN), and complementary non-hypoxic tumour subvolumes and non-hypoxic lymph node subvolumes (nonHSV-T, nonHSV-LN) were generated for a threshold level of 1.4 times the FMISO SUVmean within the NT. Volumes were contoured for all time points (week 0, 2 and 5) individually. Average values and standard deviation for T2* values and FDG SUVmean were obtained within the volumes NT, GTV-T, GTV-LN, and hypoxic subvolumes HSV-T, HSV-LN and complementary non-hypoxic subvolumes nonHSV-T and nonHSV-LN, respectively (Additional file 2: Figure S1).For statistical analysis IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.0.0.1 and SigmaPlot Version 8.02 were used. A paired samples t-test was applied to compare mean values and test for statistical significance (95% confidence interval). For correlation analysis, R2 was calculated using linear regression analysis (SigmaPlot). For week 0, correlations between FMISO uptake, FDG uptake and T2* were analysed by correlating SUVmax tumour/SUVmean muscle for FMISO and FDG with each other and with mean T2* signal: within GTV-T (respectively within GTV-LN), R2 (FMISO to T2*) was calculated for FMISO SUVmax GTV-T/SUVmean NT to T2* mean GTV-T and R2 (FMISO to FDG) was calculated for FMISO SUVmax GTV-T/SUVmean NT to FDG SUVmax GTV-T/SUVmean NT. For weeks 2 and 5, correlations between FMISO uptake and T2* were analysed.

Legal issues

The study was approved by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, and the local ethical committee. Production and use of PET radiopharmaceutical [18F]-FMISO was approved and registered at the appropriate authority.

Results

GTV and HSV under RCT

10/32 patients met inclusion criteria for image analysis by presenting a complete set of serial FMISO-PET and at least two serial 3 Tesla MRI image sets. Images were co-registered and volumes for GTV-T, GTV-LN, and NT were delineated within T1w-MRI Gd, with T2 and FDG-PET being co-registered. The number of lymph nodes present in the GTV-LN is shown in Additional file 3: Table S2. HSV were obtained within FMISO-PET as described and are shown in Table 1. GTV-T and GTV-LN more than halved from week 0 to 5. Hypoxic subvolumes HSV-T and HSV-LN decreased over time and nearly completely resolved (see Table 1, Fig. 1). A representative example of imaging modalities (T1w-MRI, T2* MRI and FMISO-PET) showing reduction of GTV during RCT and location of HSV is demonstrated in Fig. 2.
Table 1

Tumour and lymph node volumes, hypoxic subvolumes

week

GTV-T [ml]

GTV-LN [ml]

HSV-T [ml]

HSV-LN [ml]

0

37 ± 22

16 ± 14

4 ± 7

2.1 ± 3.3

2

24 ± 15

14 ± 14

1 ± 2

0.8 ± 1.4

5

16 ± 11

7 ± 6

0.001 ± 0.004

0.19 ± 0.59

∆ 0–5

- 57%

- 56%

- 100%

- 91%

Mean volumes (± STD) for tumour (GTV-T), lymph nodes (GTV-LN) and hypoxic subvolumes delineated on FMISO-PET (HSV-T, HSV-LN) before (week 0) and during radiochemotherapy (week 2 and 5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Hypoxic tumour- and lymph node subvolumes. Marked reduction of tumour hypoxia during RCT for both HSV-T and HSV-LN between week 0 to week 5

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Representative example of imaging modalities MRI T1, T2*, and FMISO-PET. Primary tumour and lymph node metastasis (pt. 5, tonsillar carcinoma) at week 0, 2, and 5 (upper, middle, lower panel): co-registered image sets from MRI T1, MRI T2*, FMISO-PET (left to right). Red contours: GTV-T, GTV-LN. Blue contour: HSV-LN

Mean T2*

Mean values for T2* were obtained within designated volumes for each patient (Fig. 3, Additional file 4: Table S3 and Additional file 5: Figure S2). For mean T2* no significant difference was seen between GTV-T and NT for all time points (p = 0.239 to 0.879). GTV-LN showed significantly higher mean T2* at week 2 compared to NT and GTV-T: 27.6 ms for GTV-LN compared to 21.0 ms for NT (p = 0.021) and 19.1 ms for GTV-T (p = 0.009). Mean T2* showed no significant change over time for GTV-T while for GTV-LN a slight decrease week 2 to 5 was seen (p = 0.049). GTV and HSV contours in MRI T2* as well as the range of T2* values are visualized in Additional file 6: Figure S3.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Time course of T2* values within volumes. T2* mean ± STD within tumour, lymph nodes and normal tissue for all patients (n = 10)

Hypoxic vs. non-hypoxic subvolumes

Hypoxic and complementary non-hypoxic tumour and lymph node subvolumes derived from FMISO-PET were compared for T2* signal and FDG SUVmean. HSV-T showed smaller mean T2* values compared to nonHSV-T for all time points, reaching borderline significance level at week 0 (15.0 ± 4.6 ms for HSV-T versus 18.3 ± 2.9 ms for nonHSV-T, p = 0.051), see Fig. 4. T2* values within HSV-LN and nonHSV-LN were not significantly different for all time points (p = 0.895, p = 0.545, Additional file 4: Table S3). FDG SUVmean was significantly higher within hypoxic regions of both tumour and lymph nodes: HSV-T 12.1 ± 5.5 as compared to nonHSV-T 6.1 ± 2.6 and HSV-LN of 10.2 ± 3.9 as compared to nonHSV-LN of 4.7 ± 1.9 (p = 0.026 and p = 0.011). By definition, FMISO uptake was higher within hypoxic tumour subvolumes as compared to non-hypoxic tumour subvolumes. See Fig. 4 for GTV-T FMISO SUVmean and FMISO SUVmax. Within HSV-T, T2* steadily increased from week 0 to 5, while within HSV-LN a slight decrease was seen. Neither of these changes reached significance level on a paired t-test (p = 0.53 and p = 0.94).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Hypoxic tumour subvolumes: T2* values vs. FDG uptake and FMISO uptake. T2* values (ms) were lower and FDG uptake was higher within hypoxic tumour subvolumes as compared to non-hypoxic tumour subvolumes (*p = 0.051, **p = 0.026). FMISO uptake was higher within hypoxic tumour subvolumes than within non-hypoxic tumour subvolumes (***p = 0.029, p = 0.072, ****p = 0.003, p = 0.0001)

Correlation analysis

For GTV-T at week 0, the linear regression coefficient R2 between FMISO and FDG was 0.81 (p = 0.0054), and 0.32 between FMISO and T2* (p = 0.1157). For GTV-LN, the comparison between FMISO and FDG yielded an R2 of 0.30 (p = 0.2057), and an R2 of 0.51 (p = 0.0459) between FMISO and T2*. At weeks 2 and 5, R2 between FMISO and T2* was 0.37 (p = 0.1073) and 0.12 (p = 0.3663) for GTV-T, and 0.04 (p = 0.6334) and 0.01 (p = 0.8089) for GTV-LN. Correlation plots for GTV-T at baseline are shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Correlation of FMISO uptake with mean T2* and FDG uptake. Plots showing correlation within GTV-T at baseline

Discussion

T2* measurements are being considered a novel non-invasive MRI imaging marker for tumour oxygenation [1934] whereas FMISO-PET is among the most commonly used imaging modalities for non-invasive hypoxia imaging [113, 3538] and could be considered the gold standard. In this prospective longitudinal imaging study we investigated the effect of RCT on T2* values of primary tumours and lymph node metastasis of HNSCC. The imaging protocol included serial MR measurements of T2* and FMISO-PET imaging at 3 time points during definitive RCT. This study is among the first to analyse the effect of radiation on T2* and the first to combine FMISO imaging with T2* measurements in HNSCC.

The more than 50% reduction of GTV-T and GTV-LN up to week 5 and the marked reduction of tumour hypoxia on FMISO-PET (i.e. HSV) in this study are in line with previous findings [4, 7, 8]. Specifically, the pronounced reduction of HSV for both tumour and lymph node metastasis at week 2 and nearly complete resolution at week 5 can be interpreted as tumour reoxygenation. Contrary to the time course of FMISO, we did not see significant changes for T2* over time: A significant difference was only seen for GTV-LN between week 2 and 5, possibly a statistical artefact due to a slight T2* increase from week 0 and 2, as between weeks 0 to 5 there was no significant change. The absence of significant changes for T2* over time is in contrast to the dynamic changes seen with FMISO-PET. While it is possible to stratify patients according to their reoxygenation pattern found on FMISO-PET, this is currently not possible with T2*. For methodological reasons, different endpoints had to be used for FMISO-PET derived hypoxia (hypoxic volumes) and T2* MRI derived oxygenation status (average value within volumes).

It is of note that for GTV-LN higher T2* values were found than for GTV-T for all time points (reaching significance level at week 2). In line with this finding, Panek et al. [23] also described higher T2* values for lymph node metastasis than for primary tumours. Possible explanations might be local magnetic field inhomogeneity caused by air–tissue interfaces that affects T2* values at the outer rim of primary tumours more than that of lymph nodes, as the primary tumours are closer to the air-filled structures of the pharynx and the airways. In addition, T2* is also affected by the T2 value of the tissue which is different for tumour and lymph node.

The comparison between FMISO-PET derived hypoxic tumour subvolumes to complementary non-hypoxic tumour subvolumes showed smaller T2* values for HSV as compared to non-HSV for all time points. This might indicate a correlation between oxygenation status and T2* before therapy. Statistical significance was not reached, however a borderline significance level (p = 0.051). Our findings on T2* values within HSV over time were opposed for GTV-T and GTV-LN: within hypoxic tumour volumes, T2* steadily increased from week 0 to 5, supportive for improved tumour oxygenation over time, whereas within hypoxic lymph node subvolumes a slight decrease was seen (none of these changes were significant).

FDG-PET was conducted only once (week 0) and not at later time points for patient convenience. FDG uptake within hypoxic subvolumes was significantly higher than within complementary non-hypoxic subvolumes for both tumour and lymph nodes. Accordingly, within GTV-T the correlation between FMISO uptake and FDG uptake was strong (R2 = 0.81) whereas only a weak correlation (R2 = 0.32) was found between FMISO uptake and mean T2*. Interestingly, for lymph nodes the correlation between FMISO and T2* was moderate (R2 = 0.51) while the correlation between FMISO and FDG was weak (R2 = 0.30).

Due to the overlap between FDG avid regions and hypoxic regions on FMISO-PET [8, 39], FDG-PET has been discussed as a potential surrogate for FMISO-PET for the definition of a dose escalation volume. Based on our data of primary tumours, we can support the finding of a correlation between FDG uptake and FMISO uptake. The correlation between T2* and FMISO uptake was less pronounced.

The effective transverse relaxation time, T2*, and its inverse, the transverse relaxation rate, R2* = 1/T2*, are influenced by the presence of paramagnetic deoxyhaemoglobin in venous blood. Thus, deoxyhaemoglobin serves as a naturally occuring contrast agent that allows quantification of oxygenation [20, 22, 25]. Changes in T2* are stronger in large vessels than in microvasculature. For brain imaging at 1.5 Tesla, short T2* down to 10 ms were reported in the sagittal sinus compared with 25–50 ms in larger arterioles and venules [24, 40].

Punwani et al. measured T2* in the brain of neonatal piglets and found a strong correlation between R2* and the absolute deoxyhaemoglobin concentration [25]. Panek et al. investigated T2* at baseline before onset of radiation therapy in ten HNSCC patients and found T2* at 3 Tesla applicable to assess clinically relevant changes in tumour oxygenation [23]. Additionally, T2* measurements were applied in a mouse tumour model and R2* fluctuations were described by the authors in both xenografts and patient tumours [41]. The same group used T2* to assess the effect of blood transfusions on tumour oxygenation in HNSCC patients, revealing no change in tumour oxygenation after transfusion [42]. Spontaneous fluctuations of T2* signal were also reported by Baudelet et al. in a mouse tumour model [19]. This observation was found within regions of functional vasculature and therefore interpreted as spontaneous fluctuations in blood flow and oxygenation associated with the pathophysiology of acute hypoxia in tumours [19]. Li et al. investigated R2* for predicting the prognosis of cervical squamous carcinoma treated with RCT and found significantly lower R2* values for responders compared to the non-responders [30]. Contrarily in HNSCC during RCT, Wong et al. found no significant difference between R2* for responders and non-responders [34] and Min et al. found no clear pattern for changes in R2* by analyzing intra-tumour ROIs [33]. For cervical cancer patients, Kim et al. reported significantly lower R2* values pre-RCT than post-RCT, indicating increased tumour hypoxia after treatment - a finding that was interpreted as caused by increased deoxyhaemoglobin concentration through reduction in vascular permeability and blood flow after treatment [29]. In a preclinical rat tumour model, Hallac et al. was able to correlate R2* obtained by blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MRI with pO2 [43]. In our study, no distinct correlation between hypoxia as derived from FMISO-PET and T2* was found. As tumour size in HNSCC during RCT is rapidly changing, the change in tumour size and composition might be a possible explanation for this discrepancy. In addition, T2* measurements are strongly affected by the amount of blood supply (perfusion, vascular permeability) and deoxyhaemoglobin concentration, which might change during RCT. Appropriately, in a recent study in prostate cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, assessment of hypoxia by FMISO-PET and MRI-based perfusion showed a correlation at baseline only but not following therapy [44].

There are some limitations to the present study: 1. optimal image fusion is crucial for correlation analysis. MRI and PET/CT images (both with identical mask fixation of the head and neck region) were fused by a treatment planning software with validated image registration algorithm. However, image fusion within the head and neck region is more critical than intracranial image fusion due to anatomical and physiological reasons. 2. The hypoxic subvolumes used for analysis of average T2* values were representative at baseline but became very small at later time points. 3. The study evaluates a relatively small number of patients. Including a higher number of patients however would raise an ethical problem due to the burden imposed on patients by frequent imaging sessions and long imaging protocols. In the current study, 11 of 32 patients could not be considered as they were included before availability of the 3 Tesla MRI. For the remaining 21 patients, a high dropout rate was found, as only 10 fulfilled inclusion criteria due to missing image sets.

Nevertheless, this prospective trial demonstrated that clinically, T2* may not be suitable to replace FMISO PET as a valuable surrogate imaging marker to monitor tumour oxygenation and hypoxic areas during the course of radiotherapy. Future analyses are planned to further examine the role of T2* imaging in the context of tumour hypoxia.

Conclusions

In summary, marked reduction of tumour hypoxia between week 0, 2 and 5 found on FMISO-PET was not accompanied by a significant T2*change within GTVs over time. Our results suggest a relation between tumour oxygenation status and T2* at baseline, but no simple correlation during the course of radiotherapy. Therefore, caution is warranted when using T2* as a substitute for FMISO-PET to monitor tumour hypoxia during RCT in HNSCC patients.

Notes

Abbreviations

∆: 

Delta

BOLD: 

Blood oxygenation level-dependent

CT: 

Computed tomography

DCE-MRI: 

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

DWI-MRI: 

Diffusion weighted MRI

FAZA : 

18F-fluoroazomycinarabinoside

FDG: 

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

FDG-PET: 

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT

FLASH: 

Multi-echo fast spoiled gradient echo

FMISO: 

18F-misonidazole

FMISO-PET: 

18F-misonidazole PET/CT

Gd: 

Gadolinium

GTV: 

Gross tumour volume

GTV-LN: 

Gross tumour volume of metastatic lymph nodes

GTV-T: 

Gross tumour volume of primary tumour

HNSCC: 

Squamous cell head-and-neck cancer

HSV: 

Hypoxic subvolume

HSV-LN: 

Hypoxic subvolume of lymph node metastasis

HSV-T: 

Hypoxic subvolume of primary tumour

LN: 

Lymph nodes

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

nonHSV-LN: 

Non-hypoxic subvolume of lymph node metastasis

nonHSV-T: 

Non-hypoxic subvolume of primary tumour

NT: 

Normal tissue

p.i.: 

Post injection

PET: 

Positron emission tomography

PET/CT: 

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography

R2*: 

Relaxation rate

RCT: 

Radiochemotherapy

STD: 

Standard deviation

SUV: 

Standardized uptake value

SUVmax: 

Maximum standardized uptake value

SUVmean: 

Mean standardized uptake value

T: 

Primary tumour

T1w-MRI: 

T1-weighted MRI

T2*: 

Transverse relaxation time

T2w-MRI: 

T2-weighted MRI

TE: 

Echo time

TR: 

Repetition time

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Eva Hermann, Christopher Schmitt, Carmen Meffle, Erika Lübke and Hans-Jürgen Koth for technical and administrative support. We thank Jeffrey and Tanja Davis for proofreading.

Funding

This trial was supported by the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

The manuscript was written by NW. MB, ALG, MM, CS, MBü, NHN and LB were contributors in writing the manuscript. HB and AB were concerned with patient treatment. LM and HB prepared image analysis. NW, HB and LM generated hypoxic subvolumes. HCR and NW delineated GTVs. PTM, MM, CS were concerned with PET/CT imaging (acquisition and protocol definition), analysis and interpretation of PET/CT data. MB, MBü, UL, LB, and AP were concerned with the MRI sequences. NW, MB, ALG analysed and interpreted the data. NW performed the statistical analysis. ALG, JH and PTM supervised the project. The concept was established by ALG and WW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection, the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, and the local ethics committee. Production and use of PET radiopharmaceutical 18F-fluoromisonidazole (F-MISO) was approved and registered at the appropriate authority. All patients gave written informed consent prior to undergoing imaging (MRI and PET/CT) and radiotherapy.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for data analysis and publication was obtained from all patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
(2)
Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
(3)
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
(4)
German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
(5)
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
(6)
Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

References

  1. Thorwarth D, Eschmann SM, Scheiderbauer J, Paulsen F, Alber M. Kinetic analysis of dynamic 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET correlates with radiation treatment outcome in head-and-neck cancer. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:152.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Rajendran JG, Schwartz DL, O'Sullivan J, Peterson LM, Ng P, Scharnhorst J, et al. Tumor hypoxia imaging with [F-18] fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography in head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5435–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Padhani AR, Krohn KA, Lewis JS, Alber M. Imaging oxygenation of human tumours. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:861–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Zips D, Zophel K, Abolmaali N, Perrin R, Abramyuk A, Haase R, et al. Exploratory prospective trial of hypoxia-specific PET imaging during radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:21–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Alber M, Thorwarth D. Multi-modality functional image guided dose escalation in the presence of uncertainties. Radiother Oncol. 2014;111:354–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Schutze C, Bergmann R, Bruchner K, Mosch B, Yaromina A, Zips D, et al. Effect of [(18)F]FMISO stratified dose-escalation on local control in FaDu hSCC in nude mice. Radiother Oncol. 2014;111:81–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wiedenmann NE, Bucher S, Hentschel M, Mix M, Vach W, Bittner MI, et al. Serial [18F]-fluoromisonidazole PET during radiochemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer and its correlation with outcome. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:113–7.Google Scholar
  8. Bittner MI, Wiedenmann N, Bucher S, Hentschel M, Mix M, Weber WA, et al. Exploratory geographical analysis of hypoxic subvolumes using 18F-MISO-PET imaging in patients with head and neck cancer in the course of primary chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy Oncol. 2013;108:511–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Thorwarth D. Biologically adapted radiation therapy. Z Med Phys. 2018;28(3):177–83.Google Scholar
  10. Welz S, Monnich D, Pfannenberg C, Nikolaou K, Reimold M, La Fougere C, et al. Prognostic value of dynamic hypoxia PET in head and neck cancer: results from a planned interim analysis of a randomized phase II hypoxia-image guided dose escalation trial. RadiotherOncol. 2017;124:526–32.Google Scholar
  11. Boeke S, Thorwarth D, Monnich D, Pfannenberg C, Reischl G, La Fougere C, et al. Geometric analysis of loco-regional recurrences in relation to pre-treatment hypoxia in patients with head and neck cancer. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2017;56:1571–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lock S, Perrin R, Seidlitz A, Bandurska-Luque A, Zschaeck S, Zophel K, et al. Residual tumour hypoxia in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing primary radiochemotherapy, final results of a prospective trial on repeat FMISO-PET imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2017;124:533–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Grkovski M, Schoder H, Lee NY, Carlin SD, Beattie BJ, Riaz N, et al. Multiparametric imaging of tumor hypoxia and perfusion with 18F-Fluoromisonidazole dynamic PET in head and neck Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1072–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Linge A, Lohaus F, Lock S, Nowak A, Gudziol V, Valentini C, et al. HPV status, cancer stem cell marker expression, hypoxia gene signatures and tumour volume identify good prognosis subgroups in patients with HNSCC after primary radiochemotherapy: a multicentre retrospective study of the German Cancer consortium radiation oncology group (DKTK-ROG). Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:364–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Peeters SG, Zegers CM, Lieuwes NG, van Elmpt W, Eriksson J, van Dongen GA, et al. A comparative study of the hypoxia PET tracers [(1)(8)F]HX4, [(1)(8)F]FAZA, and [(1)(8)F]FMISO in a preclinical tumor model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;91:351–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlin S, Zhang H, Reese M, Ramos NN, Chen Q, Ricketts SA. A comparison of the imaging characteristics and microregional distribution of 4 hypoxia PET tracers. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:515–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Wack LJ, Monnich D, van Elmpt W, Zegers CM, Troost EG, Zips D, et al. Comparison of [18F]-FMISO, [18F]-FAZA and [18F]-HX4 for PET imaging of hypoxia--a simulation study. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2015;54:1370–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Grosu AL, Souvatzoglou M, Roper B, Dobritz M, Wiedenmann N, Jacob V, et al. Hypoxia imaging with FAZA-PET and theoretical considerations with regard to dose painting for individualization of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:541–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Baudelet C, Ansiaux R, Jordan BF, Havaux X, Macq B, Gallez B. Physiological noise in murine solid tumours using T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging: a marker of tumour acute hypoxia? Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:3389–411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Thomas B, Shroff MM, Haacke EM. Principles, techniques, and applications of T2*-based MR imaging and its special applications. Radiographics. 2009;29:1433–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Christen T, Lemasson B, Pannetier N, Farion R, Remy C, Zaharchuk G, et al. Is T2* enough to assess oxygenation? Quantitative blood oxygen level-dependent analysis in brain tumor. Radiology. 2012;262:495–502.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:9868–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Panek R, Welsh L, Dunlop A, Wong KH, Riddell AM, Koh DM, et al. Repeatability and sensitivity of T2* measurements in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;44:72–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Prielmeier F, Nagatomo Y, Frahm J. Cerebral blood oxygenation in rat brain during hypoxic hypoxia. Quantitative MRI of effective transverse relaxation rates. Magn Reson Med. 1994;31:678–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Punwani S, Ordidge RJ, Cooper CE, Amess P, Clemence M. MRI measurements of cerebral deoxyhaemoglobin concentration [dHb]--correlation with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). NMR Biomed. 1998;11:281–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor NJ, Baddeley H, Goodchild KA, Powell ME, Thoumine M, Culver LA, et al. BOLD MRI of human tumor oxygenation during carbogen breathing. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:156–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hallac RR, Ding Y, Yuan Q, McColl RW, Lea J, Sims RD, et al. Oxygenation in cervical cancer and normal uterine cervix assessed using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI at 3T. NMR Biomed. 2012;25:1321–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou H, Zhang Z, Denney R, Williams JS, Gerberich J, Stojadinovic S, et al. Tumor physiological changes during hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy assessed using multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. Oncotarget. 2017;8:37464–77.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK, Park W, Huh SJ. Blood oxygenation level-dependent MR imaging as a predictor of therapeutic response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer: a preliminary experience. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1514–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Li XS, Fan HX, Fang H, Song YL, Zhou CW. Value of R2* obtained from T2*-weighted imaging in predicting the prognosis of advanced cervical squamous carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:681–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wacker CM, Bock M, Hartlep AW, Beck G, van Kaick G, Ertl G, et al. Changes in myocardial oxygenation and perfusion under pharmacological stress with dipyridamole: assessment using T*2 and T1 measurements. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41:686–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Preibisch C, Shi K, Kluge A, Lukas M, Wiestler B, Göttler J, et al. Characterizing hypoxia in human glioma: A simultaneous multimodal MRI and PET study. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3775
  33. Min M, Lee MT, Lin P, Holloway L, Wijesekera D, Gooneratne D, et al. Assessment of serial multi-parametric functional MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging and R2*) with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150530.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wong KH, Panek R, Dunlop A, Mcquaid D, Riddell A, Welsh LC, et al. Changes in multimodality functional imaging parameters early during chemoradiation predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(5):759–67.Google Scholar
  35. Thorwarth D, Monnich D, Zips D. Methodological aspects on hypoxia PET acquisition and image processing. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;57:235–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bittner MI, Wiedenmann N, Bucher S, Hentschel M, Mix M, Rucker G, et al. Analysis of relation between hypoxia PET imaging and tissue-based biomarkers during head and neck radiochemotherapy. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2016;55:1299–304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Leibfarth S, Simoncic U, Monnich D, Welz S, Schmidt H, Schwenzer N, et al. Analysis of pairwise correlations in multi-parametric PET/MR data for biological tumor characterization and treatment individualization strategies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1199–208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Simoncic U, Leibfarth S, Welz S, Schwenzer N, Schmidt H, Reischl G, et al. Comparison of DCE-MRI kinetic parameters and FMISO-PET uptake parameters in head and neck cancer patients. Med Phys. 2017;44:2358–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Monnich D, Thorwarth D, Leibfarth S, Pfannenberg C, Reischl G, Mauz PS, et al. Overlap of highly FDG-avid and FMISO hypoxic tumor subvolumes in patients with head and neck cancer. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2017;56:1577–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wedegartner U, Kooijman H, Andreas T, Beindorff N, Hecher K, Adam G. T2 and T2* measurements of fetal brain oxygenation during hypoxia with MRI at 3T: correlation with fetal arterial blood oxygen saturation. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:121–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Panek R, Welsh L, Baker LCJ, Schmidt MA, Wong KH, Riddell AM, et al. Noninvasive imaging of cycling hypoxia in head and neck Cancer using intrinsic susceptibility MRI. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4233–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Welsh L, Panek R, Riddell A, Wong K, Leach MO, Tavassoli M, et al. Blood transfusion during radical chemo-radiotherapy does not reduce tumour hypoxia in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Br J Cancer. 2017;116:28–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Hallac RR, Zhou H, Pidikiti R, Song K, Stojadinovic S, Zhao D, et al. Correlations of noninvasive BOLD and TOLD MRI with pO2 and relevance to tumor radiation response. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:1863–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Mainta IC, Zilli T, Tille JC, De Perrot T, Vallée JP, Buchegger F, Garibotto V, Miralbell R. The effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on tumor hypoxia in high-grade prostate cancer: an (18)F-MISO PET-MRI study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.02.170.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018
corrected publication 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement