You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Use of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen for follow-up monitoring of cervical cancer patients who were treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy

  • 1, 2,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Radiation Oncology20105:78

  • Received: 3 May 2010
  • Accepted: 15 September 2010
  • Published:



To investigate the significance of monitoring the levels of the serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) for the detection of recurrent disease in patients with cervical cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy.


The records of 112 patients with cervical cancer were reviewed. Serum SCC-Ag levels were measured at regular follow-up visits. A SCC-Ag level of 2 ng/mL was considered the upper limit of normal. Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutively increasing SCC-Ag values above normal. Recurrent disease was confirmed by histologic and radiographic studies.


Eighteen patients (16%) developed recurrent disease. Sixteen patients had initially elevated SCC-Ag, post-treatment normalization of SCC-Ag, and tumor recurrence. The SCC-Ag difference (ΔSCC-Ag), defined as the difference between the last value after two consecutively increases above normal and the value immediately before the elevation, had good clinical performance in predicting cancer recurrence. The cutoff value of ΔSCC-Ag was 0.95 ng/mL.


SCC-Ag is a relatively good method for the detection of disease recurrence in patients with cervical cancer who were treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy.


  • Cervical Cancer
  • Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
  • Cervical Cancer Patient
  • Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
  • Biochemical Failure


Radiotherapy has maintained its place as the cornerstone of therapy for many decades for uterine cervical cancer. Recently, the results of several randomized trials have recommended the concomitant administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy as a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer [13]. Although this combination treatment plays a role in improving disease control, many patients suffer from tumor recurrence during the follow-up period. Therefore, the identification of prognostic factors associated with disease course and outcome following chemoradiotherapy may help to guide the development of more effective treatments and prevent tumor recurrence.

Over the past decade, several serum markers have been investigated to search for additional prognostic parameters that could be used, to monitor the treatment response, and detect the recurrence in patients with cervical cancer. In particular, the squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) is the most commonly used tumor marker for cervical cancer. SCC-Ag is a sub-fraction of the tumor antigen TA-4, a 48 kDa glycoprotein first isolated by Kato and Torigoe [4]. This antigen is present in normal cervical epithelium, but has higher expression in cervical neoplasms [5]. With the development of a sensitive radioimmunoassay, this marker can be readily detected in the serum and is now considered a valuable tool for monitoring cervical cancer. Serum SCC-Ag levels correlate with the extent of disease [68], response to radiotherapy [9], response to chemotherapy [10, 11], and can be used to predict survival and tumor recurrence during follow-up [1216]. Several studies have reported the use of serial SCC-Ag data for post-therapeutic monitoring. In these reports, 70-86% of cervical cancer patients with recurrent disease had elevated SCC-Ag levels at some time during follow-up [7, 8, 11, 14, 16]. However, few studies have focused on cervical cancer patients treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), which is now considered the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.

In the present study, we investigated the potential use of SCC-Ag as a marker for predicting tumor recurrence in uterine cervical cancer patients treated with CCRT.


Between July 2001 and February 2004, 124 previously untreated women with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IV uterine cervical cancer were entered in a CCRT protocol at the National Cancer Center (Goyang, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea). Twelve cases that lacked regular SCC-Ag determinations in the follow-up period were excluded from the study. The pre-treatment evaluation consisted of a complete medical history, physical examination, full blood counts, biochemical profile, serum SCC-Ag, chest radiography, intravenous pyelogram, cystoscopy, rectosigmoidoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan, and/or [18F]-flouro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

All patients were given external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with 15 MV X-rays from a linear accelerator (Varian Clinac 2100CD; Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). EBRT was administered to the whole pelvic region using a four-field box technique or parallel opposed anterior-posterior beams. The radiation field included the primary tumor, uterus, paracervical, parametrial and uterosacral regions, and the pelvic lymph nodes. The para-aortic lymph nodes were also included if metastasis was diagnosed during pre-treatment imaging study. The radiation dose administered to the whole pelvis was 41.4-45 Gy (median 45 Gy), given in daily doses of 1.8 Gy, five fractions per week. An additional boost of 5.4-21.4 Gy (median 10 Gy) was given to the gross residual tumor and involved the parametrium without any midline shielding. The dose to the para-aortic area was 45 Gy, with or without an additional booster dose of 10 Gy. Intracavitary brachytherapy was administered twice weekly. Fletcher-Suit afterloading applicators were used for high-dose-rate brachytherapy with an Iridium-192 source (Microselectron®; Nucletron, Veenendaal, The Netherlands). The brachytherapy dose for each insertion was 4 or 5 Gy at point A, and the total dose of brachytherapy was 24-35 Gy (median 24 Gy). All patients also were given concurrent chemotherapy, which consisted of weekly doses of 40 mg/m2 i.v. cisplatin for four to six cycles.

After completion of CCRT, all patients were given clinical examinations and assayed for serum SCC-Ag during the follow-up visits. A radiation oncologist and a gynecologist followed the patients for one month after treatment, then every three months for the first two years, and every 3-6 months thereafter. The follow-up intervals varied for patients suspected of having recurrent disease, based on individual situations. Patients with suspicious symptoms, such as signs at the physical examination or an elevated serum SCC-Ag level during follow-up periods, were given additional tests (histological examination, abdomino-pelvic CT, pelvic MRI, FDG-PET, etc.) to confirm the presence of recurrent diseases.

Serum SCC-Ag levels were measured using an immunoradiometric assay with a commercially available kit (SCC-RIABEAD; SRL Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A measurement of 2 ng/mL was considered the upper limit of normal. Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutively increasing SCC-Ag values above the normal limits. For further statistical analysis, after two consecutive elevated SCC-Ag readings, the delta (Δ) SCC-Ag was defined as the difference between the final value and the value immediately before the elevation.

Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the probability of tumor recurrence from ΔSCC-Ag. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to define the optimal cutoff point for the SCC-Ag values relative to the probability of a recurrence.


Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the 112 enrolled patients. At diagnosis, 77 patients had elevated serum SCC-Ag, corresponding to an overall pre-treatment sensitivity of 68.8% (77/112). Most patients (96.1%) had normalized SCC-Ag levels at one month after completion of CCRT. The median follow-up duration was 39 months (range, 16 - 55 months). Figure 1 shows the follow-up results.
Table 1

Patient characteristics


Age -- years





FIGO stage -- No. (%)


   11 ( 9.8)


   13 (11.6)


   66 (58.9)


   22 (19.7)

Histology -- No. (%)

   Squamous cell carcinoma

   102 (91.1)


   7 ( 6.2)

   Adenosquamous cell carcinoma

   3 ( 2.7)

Pelvic lymph node* -- No. (%)


   61 (54.5)


   51 (45.5)

Tumor diameter -- No. (%)

   Range (cm)


   ≤4 cm

   65 (58.0)

   >4 cm

   47 (42.0)

Abbreviations: FIGO = International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

* Pelvic lymph node status was diagnosed by imaging study.

Figure 1
Figure 1

A diagram of the follow-up results and the change in the SCC-Ag values in all patients.* Elevated serum SCC-Ag level means a biochemical failure that is defined as two consecutively increasing tumor marker values above the normal limits, † No evidence of disease.

After completion of CCRT, 18 patients (16%) experienced tumor recurrence during the follow-up period. Among these 18 patients, 11 had post-treatment SCC-Ag elevations (biochemical failure) before the appearance of clinically evident disease with a median lead-time of 2 months (range, 1 - 15 months). An analysis of all patients (n = 112) indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of elevated post-treatment SCC-Ag levels in association with recurrent disease were 61.1% and 97.9%, respectively. For patients with elevated pre-treatment SCC-Ag only (n = 77), these values were similar (Table 2).
Table 2

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the tumor maker for predicting a recurrence in all patients* and in patients with elevated pretreatment tumor marker


SCC-Ag (n = 112)*

SCC-Ag (n = 77)


11/18 (61.1%)

11/16 (68.8%)


92/94 (97.9%)

59/61 (96.7%)


11/13 (84.6%)

11/13 (84.6%)


92/99 (92.9%)

59/64 (92.2%)

Abbreviations: SCC-Ag = squamous cell carcinoma antigen; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

Next, we performed logistic regression of all patients (n = 112) to estimate the probability of tumor recurrence based on ΔSCC-Ag measurements. Our results indicate that ΔSCC-Ag was a significant predictor of tumor recurrence (p = 0.001). Then, we performed ROC analysis of ΔSCC-Ag to determine the optimal levels for predicting the probability of tumor recurrence (Figure 2). The area under the ROC curve of ΔSCC-Ag, which is considered to indicate the accuracy of the test, was 0.78. The predictability of recurrence was analyzed for patients who had an increase in the level of pre-treatment SCC-Ag (n = 77). Logistic regression analysis also indicated that ΔSCC-Ag was a significant predictor of tumor recurrence (p = 0.002). Figure 3 shows the ROC curve for ΔSCC-Ag in patients with elevated pre-treatment SCC-Ag (n = 77). These results indicate the area under the ROC curve of ΔSCC-Ag was 0.83 and that a ΔSCC-Ag value of 0.95 ng/mL was the optimal cutoff level for prediction of tumor recurrence. These mean that the true positive and false positive rates of tumor recurrence were 75% and 11% (respectively) when the difference between the last value after two consecutive increases above normal and the value immediately before the elevation was 0.95 ng/mL.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Receiver operating characteristic curve for ΔSCC-Ag in predicting the probability of a recurrence in all patients.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic curve for ΔSCC-Ag in predicting the probability of a recurrence in patients with elevated pre-treatment tumor markers.


Our analysis of cervical cancer patients treated with CCRT indicated that the sensitivity and specificity of two consecutive increases in serum SCC-Ag for predicting tumor recurrence were 61.1% and 97.9%, respectively. These results are comparable to previously reported results. For example, several studies of cervical cancer patients showed that an elevated serum SCC-Ag level was associated with 70-92% rate of recurrent tumors [8, 11, 1419]; in addition, the specificity of SCC-Ag during the follow-up period was quite high, varying from 95 to 98% [7, 16, 20]. According to our ROC analysis, the area under the ROC curve indicated the ΔSCC-Ag was 0.83 for patients who had elevated pre-treatment SCC-Ag. Therefore, our results indicate that ΔSCC-Ag had good clinical performance in detection of recurrent disease.

As described above, we defined biochemical failure as two consecutive SCC-Ag values above normal. There are no standard criteria used to define biochemical failure in cervical cancer, and many previous studies have simply defined failure as an increase of tumor markers above normal. However, Duk et al. [20] reported that the predictive value of a single elevation of serum SCC-Ag level for early detection of recurrence was only 48.6%, but that the predictive value was 76% when two consecutive elevated serum SCC-Ag levels were used. Furthermore, they reported that serum SCC-Ag in the second sample was considerably higher in patients who had tumor relapse than in those with no evidence of relapse. Similarly, 10 of our patients had only once instance of elevated serum SCC-Ag, with normalization at subsequent follow-ups. None of these 10 patients had any evidence of disease at the final follow-up. Therefore, we suggest use of additional measurement of SCC-Ag in patients who have a single SCC-Ag elevation above the normal limits. The use of sequential serum determinations appears to increase the sensitivity and specificity of serum SCC-Ag in predicting tumor recurrence.

The results reported here and those of others indicate that routine surveillance of serum SCC-Ag during follow-up can be used to predict tumor recurrence, but it is unclear if the early detection of recurrence will lead to better survival. The major aim of follow-up surveillance in cervical cancer is the early recognition of a recurrence, based on the presumption that early detection of tumor recurrence may allow effective salvage therapy [18]. However, the clinical relevance of detecting early recurrence of cervical cancer is controversial. Esajas et al. [18] showed that routine assessment of serum SCC-Ag in follow-up resulted in the earlier detection of a recurrence in a small proportion of patients, but did not appear to contribute to better survival. Chan et al. [17] reported similar results, in that the addition of SCC-Ag monitoring provided no advantage over a regular follow-up with a clinical examination. They concluded that posttreatment SCC-Ag monitoring was not cost-effective because there was no curative treatment for distant spread of disease. Other studies, however, have suggested that follow-up SCC-Ag measurements may improve survival. Chou et al. [21] studied the clinical features of isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence after definitive radiotherapy and reported a good correlation between lower SCC-Ag levels (SCC-Ag ≤4 ng/mL) at recurrence and disease-free survival. They concluded that periodic surveillance with this tumor marker and imaging studies allowed the early detection and implementation of salvage therapy. Forni et al. [22] reported that a simplified diagnostic approach that included the SCC-Ag assay and a gynecologic examination allowed early detection of cervical cancer recurrence with a very favorable cost-effective profile. Moreover, other recent studies reported that the use of FDG-PET in patients with asymptomatic SCC-Ag elevation allowed an earlier diagnosis of recurrence, with promising effects on survival [23, 24]. Therefore, further study will be needed to confirm the value of routine surveillance of SCC-Ag in improving survival rate from recurrent cervical cancer after earlier detection.


In summary, measurement of ΔSCC-Ag provided good clinical performance in the detection of recurrent uterine cervical cancer following CCRT. We suggest that clinicians consider performing routine measurement of SCC-Ag during the follow-up of such patient. However, our results should be interpreted with some caution, because our overall recurrence rate was very low and the follow-up period was relatively short. Therefore, a more comprehensive, large-scale study should be performed to confirm our results.

List of abbreviations


squamous cell carcinoma antigen


concurrent chemoradiotherapy


International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics


magnetic resonance imaging


computed tomography


[18F]-flouro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography


external beam radiotherapy


receiver operating characteristic.


Authors’ Affiliations

Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, 809 Madu 1-dong, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Korea
Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea


  1. Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, Muderspach LI, Chafe WE, Suggs CL, Walker JL, Gersell D: Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999, 340: 1154-1161. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401503View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens RE, Rotman M, Gershenson DM, Mutch DG: Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999, 340: 1137-1143. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401501View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Insalaco S: Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 1999, 340: 1144-1153. 10.1056/NEJM199904153401502View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kato H, Torigoe T: Radioimmunoassay for tumor antigen of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 1977, 40: 1621-1628. 10.1002/1097-0142(197710)40:4<1621::AID-CNCR2820400435>3.0.CO;2-IView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Maruo T, Shibata K, Kimura A, Hoshina M, Mochizuki M: Tumor-associated antigen, TA-4, in the monitoring of the effects of therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Serial determinations and tissue localization. Cancer 1985, 56: 302-308. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<302::AID-CNCR2820560217>3.0.CO;2-TView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolger BS, Dabbas M, Lopes A, Monaghan JM: Prognostic value of preoperative squamous cell carcinoma antigen level in patients surgically treated for cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1997, 65: 309-313. 10.1006/gyno.1997.4619View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolli JA, Doering DL, Bosscher JR, Day TG Jr, Rao CV, Owens K, Kelly B, Goldsmith J: Squamous cell carcinoma antigen: clinical utility in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1994, 55: 169-173. 10.1006/gyno.1994.1272View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Strauss HG, Laban C, Lautenschlager C, Buchmann J, Schneider I, Koelbl H: SCC antigen in the serum as an independent prognostic factor in operable squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Eur J Cancer 2002, 38: 1987-1991. 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00159-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ngan HY, Chan SY, Wong LC, Choy DT, Ma HK: Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in the monitoring of radiotherapy treatment response in carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1990, 37: 260-263. 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90344-KView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meier W, Eiermann W, Stieber P, Fateh-Moghadam A, Schneider A, Hepp H: Squamous cell carcinoma antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen levels as prognostic factors for the response of cervical carcinoma to chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 1990, 38: 6-11. 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90002-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Scambia G, Benedetti Panici P, Foti E, Amoroso M, Salerno G, Ferrandina G, Battaglia F, Greggi S, De Gaetano A, Puglia G, et al.: Squamous cell carcinoma antigen: prognostic significance and role in the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994, 12: 2309-2316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong JH, Tsai CS, Chang JT, Wang CC, Lai CH, Lee SP, Tseng CJ, Chang TC, Tang SG: The prognostic significance of pre- and posttreatment SCC levels in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated by radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 41: 823-830. 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00147-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kato H, Miyauchi F, Morioka H, Fujino T, Torigoe T: Tumor antigen of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma: correlation of circulating levels with disease progress. Cancer 1979, 43: 585-590. 10.1002/1097-0142(197902)43:2<585::AID-CNCR2820430227>3.0.CO;2-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Micke O, Bruns F, Schafer U, Prott FJ, Willich N: The impact of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen in patients with advanced cancer of uterine cervix treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy. Anticancer Res 2005, 25: 1663-1666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ngan HY, Cheng GT, Yeung WS, Wong LC, Ma HK: The prognostic value of TPA and SCC in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 1994, 52: 63-68. 10.1006/gyno.1994.1012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pras E, Willemse PH, Canrinus AA, de Bruijn HW, Sluiter WJ, ten Hoor KA, Aalders JG, Szabo BG, de Vries EG: Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and CYFRA 21-1 in cervical cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 52: 23-32. 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01805-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan YM, Ng TY, Ngan HY, Wong LC: Monitoring of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in invasive cervical cancer: is it cost-effective? Gynecol Oncol 2002, 84: 7-11. 10.1006/gyno.2001.6497View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Esajas MD, Duk JM, de Bruijn HW, Aalders JG, Willemse PH, Sluiter W, Pras B, ten Hoor K, Hollema H, van der Zee AG: Clinical value of routine serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in follow-up of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19: 3960-3966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pectasides D, Economides N, Bourazanis J, Pozadzizou P, Gogou L, Koutsiouba P, Athanassiou A: Squamous cell carcinoma antigen, tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor, and carcinoembryonic antigen for monitoring cervical cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 1994, 17: 307-312. 10.1097/00000421-199408000-00005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Duk JM, de Bruijn HW, Groenier KH, Hollema H, ten Hoor KA, Krans M, Aalders JG: Cancer of the uterine cervix: sensitivity and specificity of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen determinations. Gynecol Oncol 1990, 39: 186-194. 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90430-SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chou HH, Wang CC, Lai CH, Hong JH, Ng KK, Chang TC, Tseng CJ, Tsai CS, Chang JT: Isolated paraaortic lymph node recurrence after definitive irradiation for cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51: 442-448. 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01628-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Forni F, Ferrandina G, Deodato F, Macchia G, Morganti AG, Smaniotto D, Luzi S, D'Agostino G, Valentini V, Cellini N, et al.: Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in follow-up of cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy: evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 69: 1145-1149. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.055View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang TC, Law KS, Hong JH, Lai CH, Ng KK, Hsueh S, See LC, Chang YC, Tsai CS, Chou HH, et al.: Positron emission tomography for unexplained elevation of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels during follow-up for patients with cervical malignancies: a phase II study. Cancer 2004, 101: 164-171. 10.1002/cncr.20349View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lai CH, Yen TC, Chang TC: Positron emission tomography imaging for gynecologic malignancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007, 19: 37-41. 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32801195c9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Yoon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.