Selenium supplementation in radiotherapy patients: do we need to measure selenium levels in serum or blood regularly prior radiotherapy?
© Muecke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 30 September 2014
Accepted: 4 December 2014
Published: 16 December 2014
Considering the review by Puspitasari and colleagues, an additional discussion of the endpoints of the Se supplementation studies described would be helpful. In our view, selenium can safely be given to selenium-deficient cancer patients prior to and during radiotherapy. Therefore, in order to help the radiation oncologist in decision making, we strongly advocate to determine the selenium status prior to and during a potential adjuvant selenium supplementation, e.g. when trying to ease the side-effects of radiation treatment or in the aftercare situation when the selenium status may become insufficient.
KeywordsSelenium Supplementation Clinical studies Selenoproteins Radiotherapy
We have read with great interest the review of Puspitasari et al. and would like to thank the authors for this interesting summary which shows the possible benefits of selenium supplementation in radiotherapy patients reducing side effects and thus improving quality of life without compromising the effectiveness of radiotherapy .
In the introduction, the authors point to the necessity of a guideline helping physicians and patients with their decisions concerning selenium supplementation. They correctly point to the lack of comprehensive data. Yet, if one enlarges the range of their systematic search, there are additional data which to our opinion could form the basis of practice rules concerning selenium in cancer care. In fact, there is a wealth of preclinical and clinical data pointing to the dose-dependency of health effects from selenium supplementation and the high mortality risk of selenium-deficient cancer patients .
According to recently published studies it seems most important for cancer patients to achieve and maintain a certain range of Se in the serum. Nutritional Se intake, plasma Se concentration and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity display a positive correlation up to a certain threshold plasma Se concentration (70–100 μg/L), beyond which the GPx activity plateaus . The limit at which selenoprotein P (SePP) concentrations may no longer increase with higher Se intake has been determined at levels of around 90–125 μg Se/l plasma -. Consequently, the optimal Se range in serum likely resides between 100 and 130 μg/l ,. This is in accordance with epidemiological and clinical data which underline that cancer and mortality risks inversely correlate to Se concentrations at suboptimal levels <100 μg Se/l plasma as compared to higher Se status .
Considering the review by Puspitasari and colleagues, an additional discussion of the endpoints of the Se supplementation studies described would be helpful. In order to determine effects from selenium basic and follow-up levels need to be determined. Unfortunately, some well-known and frequently cited allegedly negative studies did not obey to these simple rules and it is thus difficult to interpret their findings ,.
Therefore, in order to help the radiation oncologist in decision making, we strongly advocate to determine the selenium status prior to and during a potential adjuvant selenium supplementation, e.g. when trying to ease the side-effects of radiation treatment or in the aftercare situation when the selenium status may become insufficient. The potential benefits for the cancer patient under radiotherapy are well-documented and undisputed ,. In our view, selenium can safely be given to selenium-deficient cancer patients prior to and during radiotherapy. Considering the known uncertainties around the appropriate Se dose and Se compound we would propose the inorganic form sodium selenite without unspecific incorporation into non-selenoenzymes and daily doses higher than in the above mentioned gynecological study of 500 μg since the patients with Se supplementation did not achieve Se levels in the serum higher than 75 μg/l . Finally we want to point out that selenium is not a medication per se but rather an adjuvant treatment option supporting the biosynthesis of 25 human genes encoding the functionally active selenoproteins needed for limiting the side effect of radiation therapy and supporting a fast recovery.
In Regard to: Irma M Puspitasari, Rizky Abdulah, Chiho Yamazaki, Satomi Kameo, Takashi Nakano and Hiroshi Koyama: Updates on clinical studies of selenium supplementation in radiotherapy. Radiation Oncology 2014, 9:125.
- Puspitasari IM, Abdulah R, Yamazaki C, Kameo S, Nakano T, Koyama H: Updates on clinical studies of selenium supplementation in radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2014, 9: 125. 10.1186/1748-717X-9-125PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer HA, Endermann T, Stephan C, Stoedter M, Behrends T, Wolff I, Jung K, Schomburg L: Selenoprotein P Status Correlates to Cancer-Specific Mortality in Renal Cancer Patients. PLoS One 2012, 7: e46644. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046644PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xia Y, Hill KE, Byrne DW, Xu J, Burk RF: Effectiveness of selenium Supplements in a low-selenium area of China. Am J Clin Nutr 2005, 81: 829-834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burk RF, Norsworthy BK, Hill KE, Motley AK, Byrne DW: Effects of chemical form of selenium on plasma biomarkers in a high-dose human supplementation trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15: 804-810. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0950View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Persson-Moschos M, Alfthan G, Akesson B: Plasma selenoprotein P levels of healthy males in different selenium status after oral supplementation with different forms of selenium. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998, 52: 363-367. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600565View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hurst R, Armah CN, Dainty JR, Hart DJ, Teucher B, Goldson AJ, Broadley MR, Motley AK, Fairweather-Tait SJ: Establishing optimal selenium status: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2010, 91: 923-931. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28169PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muecke R, Schomburg L, Buentzel J, Kisters K, Micke O: Blood selenium Status in tumor patients: Omnia sunt venena, nihil est sine veneno. Sola dosis facit venenum. Trace Elem Electrolytes 2010, 27: 181-182.Google Scholar
- Muecke R, Schomburg L, Buentzel J, Kisters K, Micke O: Selenium or no selenium-that is the question in tumor patients: a new controversy. Integr Cancer Ther 2010, 9: 136-141. 10.1177/1534735410367648View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bleys J, Navas-Acien A, Guallar E: Serum selenium levels and all cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168: 404-410. 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.74View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karp DD, Lee SJ, Keller SM, Wright GS, Aisner S, Belinsky SA, Johnson DH, Johnston MR, Goodman G, Clamon G, Okawara G, Marks R, Frechette E, McCaskill-Stevens W, Lippman SM, Ruckdeschel J, Khuri FR: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Chemoprevention Trial of Selenium Supplementation in Patients With Resected Stage I Non-Small- Cell LungCancer: ECOG 5597. J Clin Oncol 2013,31(33):4179-4187. 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2173PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lippman SM, Klein EA, Goodman PJ, Lucia MS, Thompson IM, Ford LG, Parnes HL, Minasian LM, Gaziano JM, Hartline JA, Parsons JK, Bearden JD, Crawford ED, Goodman GE, Claudio J, Winquist E, Cook ED, Karp DD, Walther P, Lieber MM, Kristal AR, Darke AK, Arnold KB, Ganz PA, Santella RM, Albanes D, Taylor PR, Probstfield JL, Jagpal TJ, Crowley JJ, et al.: Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: The selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial (SELECT). JAMA 2009, 301: 39-51. 10.1001/jama.2008.864PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muecke R, Schomburg L, Glatzel M, Bernd-Skorka R, Baaske D, Reichl B, Buentzel J, Kundt G, Prott FJ, De Vries A, Stoll G, Kisters K, Bruns F, Schaefer U, Willich N, Micke O: Multicenter, phase III trial comparing selenium supplementation with observation in gynecologic radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 70: 828-835. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.