Skip to content

Advertisement

Radiation Oncology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Trimodality bladder-sparing approach without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node-negative localized muscle-invasive urinary bladder cancer resulted in comparable cystectomy-free survival

  • Cheng-Yen Lee1,
  • Kai-Lin Yang1, 4,
  • Hui-Ling Ko1,
  • Rong-Yau Huang3,
  • Pei-Pin Tsai3,
  • Ming-Tsun Chen3,
  • Yi-Chia Lin2, 4,
  • Thomas I-Sheng Hwang2, 4,
  • Guang-Dar Juang2, 4Email author and
  • Kwan-Hwa Chi1, 5Email author
Contributed equally
Radiation Oncology20149:213

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-213

Received: 25 June 2014

Accepted: 14 September 2014

Published: 24 September 2014

Abstract

Background

To retrospectively review the efficacy and organ preservation experience for muscle-invasive bladder cancer by trimodality therapy at our institution.

Methods

Between July 2004 and February 2012, seventy patients (M/F = 55/15; median age = 69 years) of lymph node negative localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer were treated primarily with trimodality approach including transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) prior to combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CCRT). Radiotherapy consisted of initial large field size irradiation with 3D conformal technique (3D-CRT), followed by cone-down tumor bed boost with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. The median total doses delivered to bladder tumor bed and whole bladder were 59.4Gy and 40.0Gy, respectively. No patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Weekly cisplatin was administered during radiotherapy. Toxicity was scored according to the RTOG criteria. Tumor response was evaluated both cystoscopically and radiographically 3 months after treatment.

Results

The numbers of patients with T2, T3 and T4 lesions were 41, 16 and 13, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 and 5 year were 65.7%, 51.9% and 50.8%, 39.9%, respectively, after a median follow-up time of 24 months. Local-regional control and distant metastasis free survival at 2 year were 69.8% and 73.5%, respectively. Complete response (CR) rate assessed three month after CCRT was 78.1%. Ten patients (20%) had local recurrence after initial CR (n = 50), 3 of them were superficial recurrence. One patient underwent radical cystectomy after recurrence. The overall 5-year bladder intact survival was 49.0% (95% CI, 35.5% to 62.5%). Acute toxicities were limited to grade 1-2. One patient developed late grade 3 GU toxicity.

Conclusions

Our result suggested that trimodality bladder-sparing approach without NAC or dose-intensification could be well-tolerated with a high CR rate and bladder preserving rate for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Keywords

Urinary bladder cancerChemoradiationTrimodalityOrgan preservation

Background

Historically, surgery was the main treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion and pelvic lymph node dissection resulted in 5-year pelvic control rate of 80–90% and 5-year OS of 40–60% [1]. Radical cystectomy and partial cystectomy (in selected cases) are frequently regarded as standard of care in contemporary management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, where bladder-sparing radiotherapy was used as an alternative. Compared with radiotherapy alone, an OS benefit was observed with radical surgery in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer [2]. The introduction of bladder sparing therapy with or without NAC besides CCRT had been pioneered by Tester et al [3], Shipley et al [4] and Rodel et al [5]. CCRT has soon be regarded as the mainstream of organ preservation therapy instead of RT alone [6]. Although intriguing, the superiority of NAC has not been proven in randomized trial [4]. However, most trimodality treatment consisted of NAC followed by CCRT, with radical cystectomy reserved for incomplete responders in these reports [7]. Overall, the 5-year OS was approximately 50% with three-quarters of them maintaining functional bladders [7]. A trend toward increasing the intensity of chemotherapy during CCRT, such as the addition of vinblastine, paclitaxel and gemcitabine to cisplatin [811], and escalation of biological radiation dosage via hyperfractionation and hypofractionation was noted [9, 12]. However, late pelvic toxicity are concerning. In spite of these encouraging results and possible positive impact on quality of life [13], widespread use of this technique was still limited. In a report by Fedeli et al, the majority of muscle invasive bladder cancer in the United States were still treated with cystectomy (42.9%), while the minority were treated radiation therapy (16.6%) [14].

We hereby report our institutional experience on bladder preservation using upfront CCRT without NAC or adjuvant chemotherapy, with IMRT boost after whole bladder irradiation by 3D-CRT.

Methods

Patient characteristics

Between July 2004 and February 2012, 91 patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive (T2 to T4) bladder cancer who were treated with curative intent in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with pelvic lymph node metastases and distant metastases, as detected by computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or other modalities before RT were excluded in this review. Seventy patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent disease after initial TURBT treated with CCRT after TURBT or partial cystectomy were included in this analysis. This review was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital (No.20130506R). T-category was re-assigned according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis classification of 2010. The majority of patients included in the study had pathological evidence of tumoral invasion of the muscular layer, either after a TURBT (n = 64; 91.4%) or partial cystectomy (n = 4, 5.7%). The remaining patients (n = 2; 2.9%) received only biopsy, but had radiographical evidence of T4 disease. The majority of the population had urothelial cell carcinoma (n = 65, 92.9%). 55 of the patients (78.6%) had high grade disease on pathology.

Treatment

Patients were referred from urologist. Those patients were not candidates for radical cystectomy because of comorbidities or personal preference. Radiotherapy was performed 4 to 8 weeks after TURBT or partial cystectomy. Planning CT scan with 3-mm slices was acquired for all patients undergoing RT. The patients were simulated in supine position with distended bladder. They were instructed to void and take a fixed amount of fluid (350-500 mL) thirty minutes prior to both simulation and treatment. Large field irradiation to subclinical disease by 3D-CRT followed by tumor-directed boost by IMRT was our treatment guideline. High risk clinical target volumes (CTV-H) were defined as preoperative tumor bed, which were delineated on the planning CT with respect to preoperative MRI or CT images registered by image fusion. In those who underwent partial cystectomy, the positions of surgical clips needed to be taken into consideration for delineating CTV-H. In the presence of gross residual tumor, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on planning CT. The whole bladder was treated as CTV-H in the presence of multifocal disease. A 1-2 cm margin was added to CTV-H and GTV in all directions to account for organ motion and formed the planning target volume (PTV-H). IMRT was delivered via 4-10 MV photons using 5 to 7 static IMRT fields to PTV-H volume. The clinical target volume at intermediate risk (CTV-M) encompassed whole bladder in T2 disease and included pelvic nodal regions (including hypogastric, obturator, external iliac and perivesical nodes) in T3 and T4 disease. A 2-cm margin was given to CTV-M in the cranial and anterior directions and 1-cm in posterior, lateral and caudal directions, forming PTV-M. PTV-M was treated with 10 MV photons by 4-field 3D-CRT technique. All treatment planning was performed by Pinnacle version 9.0 (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA).

RT was initiated 4 to 8 weeks after urological procedure. Patients were treated with the same requirements as in the planning phase. A median total dose of 59.4Gy (range, 44.5 to 66.6Gy) was delivered to the PTV-H, and the PTV-M was irradiated with a median total dose of 40.0Gy (range, 36.0 to 54.0Gy) at 1.8-2.0 Gy per daily fraction. The prescribed doses should cover at least 95% of PTV volumes. The dose constraints were V55 < 50% for rectum, and Dmax <45Gy to both bowels and femoral heads.

Concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy was offered and consisted of cisplatin (30 mg/m2/week) for patients without impaired renal function defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >50mL/min, or carboplatin (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, 31) for patients with renal function impairment. The treatment-related characteristics were summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Patient, tumor and treatment-related characteristics

Characteristics

Value

Age, years, median (range)

69 (49–92)

Gender

 

Male

55 (78.6%)

Female

15 (21.4)

History of prior TUR-BT

 

Initial treatment

50 (71.4%)

Recurrence after previous TURBT

20 (28.6%)

ECOG Performance status

 

0

26 (37.1%)

1

43 (61.5%)

2

1 (1.4%)

Comorbidities

 

No

20 (28.6%)

Yes

50 (71.4%)

Pathology

 

Transitional cell carcinoma

65 (92.9%)

Adenocarcinoma

1 (1.4%)

Other histology or missing record

4 (5.7%)

Grade

 

High

55 (78.6%)

Low

1 (1.4%)

Missing record

14 (20.0%)

Clinical T stage

 

T2

41 (58.6%)

T3

16 (22.9%)

T4

13 (18.6%)

Focality

 

Multifocal

26 (37.2%)

Single

44 (62.8%)

Hydronephrosis

 

No

39 (55.7%)

Yes

31 (44.3%)

Procedure before radiotherapy (RT)

 

Transurethral resection (TUR)

64 (91.4%)

Partial cystectomy

4 (5.7%)

Cystoscopic biopsy only

2 (2.9%)

Follow-up and evaluation

Patients were observed at 3-month intervals for the first 3 years and every 6 months thereafter. Post-treatment follow-up consisted of pertinent medical history, physical examination, urine cytology, cystoscopy, and radiological evaluation as clinically indicated. Tumor response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) [15] both cystoscopically and radiographically (either CT or MRI) three months after treatment. Complete response (CR) was defined as the absence of detectable tumor as well as negative urine cytology. Among patients with less than CR, cystectomy was offered by the treating physicians. Salvage therapy for non-muscle invasive recurrences consisted of TUR-BT followed by intravesical therapy for non-muscle invasive recurrence and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive recurrences. However, the final decision was determined at the discretion of urologist and patient’s own will. In case of distant failure, combination cisplatin and gemcitabine was offered as first line chemotherapy. Evaluation of late treatment-related toxicity was performed according to the toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [16, 17].

Statistics

At the time of analysis, the median follow-up for the entire group was 24months. Survival was measured from the day of start of RT to the date of death or the most recent follow-up visit. The OS and PFS was calculated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and curve comparison by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards model were performed to determine clinicopathological factors with prognostic value for OS. A p-value <0.05 (two-sided) was considered significant in all of the statistical testing. The statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software for Windows version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL).

Results

Tumor response after radiotherapy

Among the 70 patients, 64 patients were evaluable for response (3 patients died of non-cancer comorbidities shortly after treatment, and 3 patients refused cystoscopic evaluation). Of the evaluable 64 patients, 78.1% (50 patients) achieved CR (Table 2). Of the remaining patients with non-CR, two (3.1%) had partial response (PR), three (4.7%) had stable disease, and nine (11.4%) had progressive disease. Although radical cystectomy was offered to all patients with less than CR, none of the patients underwent this procedure due to patients' refusal or medical inoperability.
Table 2

Tumor response after radiotherapy

 

Evaluable patients (n = 64)

Complete response (CR)

50 (78.1%)

Partial response (PR)

2 (3.1%)

Stable disease (SD)

3 (4.7%)

Progressive disease (PD)

9 (14.1%)

Survival and bladder preservation

The median survival was 64.6 months after a median follow-up of 24 months. OS and PFS at 2 year were 65.7% and 51.9%. Local-regional control and distant metastasis free survival at 2 year were 69.8% and 73.5%, respectively. Bladder cancer specific survival and survival with intact bladder at 2 year were 77.3% and 64.2% respectively. The clinical outcomes at 2 year and 5 year were illustrated in Table 3.
Table 3

Clinical outcomes

 

2-year rates

5-year rates

Overall survival

65.7%

50.8%

Bladder cancer specific survival

77.3%

67.3%

Survival with intact bladder*

64.2%

49.0%

Local-regional control

69.8%

61.7%

Distant-metastasis-free survival

73.5%

67.1%

Progression-free survival

51.9%

39.9%

*Only one patient with local failure received radical cystectomy as salvage treatment.

Univariate analysis of 12 treatment-related factors influencing OS was shown in Table 4. Age, performance status, T stage, prescribed dose to primary site and CR demonstrated significant hazard ratio on OS. Multivariate analysis showed age, performance status and CR as independent predictors on two-year overall survival (Table 4). Two-year overall survival rate was statistically higher among those with complete response than those without (79.4% [95% CI, 67.2% to 91.6%] vs. 33.3% [95% CI, 7.6% to 59.9%]; p < 0.001), while the median survival was 85.0 and 15.8 months (p < 0.001) (Figure 1).
Table 4

Univariateand multivariate analysis for prognostic factors on overall survival

Univariate analysis

 

Hazard ratio

95% confidence interval

P value

Male gender

0.730

0.327-1.627

0.442

Age, years

1.035

1.001-1.069

0.039

History of TURBT

0.986

0.465-2.087

0.971

ECOG performance status

3.182

1.388-7.291

0.006

Comorbidities

2.264

0.929-5.513

0.072

Clinical T stage

1.565

1.010-2.421

0.045

Hydronephrosis

1.825

0.901-3.692

0.095

RT duration, days

1.016

0.991-1.041

0.196

Concurrent chemotherapy

0.587

0.271-1.268

0.175

Prescribed doses to bladder tumor bed, Gy

0.914

0.858-0.972

0.005

Prescribed doses to whole bladder, Gy

1.001

0.999-1.001

0.245

Complete response (CR)

0.155

0.066-0.358

<0.001

Multivariate analysis

Age

1.064

1.023-1.107

0.002

Performance status

2.840

1.133-7.119

0.026

Complete response (CR)

0.098

0.040-0.240

<0.001

Figure 1

Overall survival of all patients and comparison between CR and non-CR patients. (A) The median survival, 2-year and 5-year OS rate of all patients were 64.6 months (95% CI, 32.3 to 97.0 months), 65.7% (95% CI, 52.6% to 76.0%), 50.8%. (95% CI, 36.7% to 63.2%). (B) Two-year overall survival rate was statistically higher among those with complete response than those without (79.4% [95% CI, 67.2% to 91.6%] vs. 33.3% [95% CI, 7.6% to 59.9%]; p < 0.001).

Failure pattern

Of the 70 patients, isolated local-regional recurrence was observed in 10 patients (15.6%); isolated distant metastasis was observed in seven (9.4%); while both local-regional and distant metastasis developed in 12 patients (18.8%) (Figure 2). Of those 50 patients with CR, local recurrence occurred in 10 patients during the course of follow-up. Among whom six were muscle invasive, three were superficial, and the remaining one had missing histology record (Table 5). Among patients who developed muscle invasive recurrences, only one patient ultimately underwent radical cystectomy as salvage treatment, while the others refused salvage cystectomy or were medically inoperable due to old age or comorbidity. None of the patients with superficial recurrences died, whereas three of the invasive recurrences did. Distant metastasis developed in one of the surviving patients with muscle invasive recurrences.
Figure 2

Failure pattern. The numbers in the circles were the patient numbers of relevant failure patterns. The percentage of relevant failure patterns were shown in the parentheses.

Table 5

Pattern of local recurrence in CR patients (n = 10)

 

Patient number

Status after salvage treatment

Superficial

  

Papillary non-invasive carcinoma

1 (10%)

Alive with NED: 1 patient

Flat carcinoma in situ

2 (20%)

Alive with NED: 2 patients

Invasive urothelial carcinoma

6 (60%)

Alive with NED: 2 patients

Alive with distant mets: 1 patient

Expired: 3 patients

Missing record

1 (10%)

Expired: 1 patient

Acute toxicity and chronic sequelae

All of the radiation induced acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities and were limited to grade 2 (Table 6), and manageable. Acute grade 2 GU toxicities accounted for 28.6% and grade 2 GI toxicities in 11.4%. Chronic GU and GI toxicities of grade 2 or more were encountered in 11 and 4 patients, respectively, while no patient with grade 3 GI toxicity. Chronic grade 3 GU toxicity developed in one patient and manifested as gross hematuria and needed repeated blood transfusion. No patient died from toxicities.
Table 6

Toxicities

 

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Acute GU toxicity

21 (30%)

20 (28. 6%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Acute GI toxicity

8 (11.4%)

8 (11.4%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Late GU toxicity

22 (31.4%)

10 (14.3%)

1 (1.43%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Late GI toxicity

1 (1.43%)

4 (5.7%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Discussion

A trimodality strategy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer as the main treatment strategy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer therapy has gained its popularity over time. However, an upfront CCRT approach without NAC is relatively infrequent.

Despite the relatively low dose density of chemotherapy in CCRT phase and a low radiation dose to the whole bladder in this study, our result of a 5 year OS of 50.8% compared reasonably to most prospective trials [7, 9, 1820] and cystectomy series [21, 22]. A clinical CR rate of 78.1% and 5 year bladder intact survival of 49.0% in this study also compared reasonably to most upfront CCRT trials. Although NAC with platinum-based regimen before cystectomy compared to cystectomy was associated with a 5% survival benefit, the possible benefit of NAC before definitive CCRT has not been firmly established. Most NAC trials were single-armed [8, 10, 23, 24], with one randomized trial demonstrating no statistically significant benefit [4].

The presence of CR was important in predicting OS was not an exception in ours as most prospective [4, 19, 25]and retrospective series [5, 26, 27]. In one retrospective series, CR in stage IV bladder cancer had significantly better prognosis than those with stage II or III disease but with no CR [26]. In this study, those who failed to achieve CR fared poorly without radical cystectomy. None of the non-CR patients was alive at 5 year. The normogram developed at Massechuses General Hospital (MGH) can be used to predict response to CCRT, in which hydronephrosis was one of the poor response indicators [28]. However, the presence of hydronephrosis might not be a contraindication to bladder organ preservation treatment, because a significant proportion of patients (43.3%) in our study presented with hydronephrosis and the rate of CR was compatible to most publications. Biomarkers might be useful to better select patients for a trimodality approach and should be evaluated in between prospective trials [29].

A total of 10 local recurrences (20%) developed among 50 CR patients. Thirty percent of them were superficial recurrence whereas most of them were still muscle-invasive. The proportion of muscle invasive recurrences in our study seemed higher than other reports. In RTOG 95-06, the number of muscle invasive recurrence were only half of superficial recurrences [19]. Our results of a 2-year bladder intact survival rate of 64.2% compared favorably to the result of RTOG 8903 that had 99 patients without hydronephrosis [4]. In our study, the overall 20% recurrence rate in CR patients is close to that observed in the Paris group, which reported a bladder recurrence rate of 17% [30].

The optimal dose and fractionation of radiation may be important in achieving a lasting response [31]. Hyperfractionation and hypofractionation were evaluated in prospective trials [19, 32]. Hypofractionated approach had better gone through whole course IMRT in order to spare normal organ at risk as much as possible. Current radiation protocol for bladder preservation regarded whole bladder dose of 54Gy and tumor bed 64-66Gy to be safe [33]. As the results of BC2001 showed no statistically increased toxicity with whole bladder irradiation to reduced high dose volume irradiation [34]. Organ motion have attributed to the uncertainties in target delineation and radiation delivery for bladder cancer treatment. Our strictly enforced bladder filling policy protocol without image-guided technique, although quite successful, should be replaced by imaged guided technique, especially for the part of tumor bed boost. The value of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of bladder cancer should be the mainstay of future work [3537].

Unlike to the routine pelvic irradiation among RTOG protocols [3, 4, 9, 19], our bladder-only approach for T2 tumors and pelvic nodal coverage for T3, T4 lesions seemed appropriate. In a large retrospective series by Stein et al [38], incidence of lymph node involvement was closely related to the T staging of the primary bladder tumor; the incidences of lymph node involvement were 18% and 42% for T2 and T4 tumors, respectively. Our radiation protocol resulted in low locoregional failure rate (15.6%). In additional to the low incidence of regional failure, our study also demonstrated very low incidence of late grade toxicity (1.43% of late GU toxicity and 0% of late GI toxicity). Acute grade 3 or more toxicity was not seen. The bladder-only irradiation in combination with 3D-CRT and IMRT to T2 disease may be a sound alternative to pelvic irradiation.

The distant metastasis free survival rate in our study is 73.5% and 67.1% at 2- and 5-year, respectively. Extravesicle diseases were consistently associated with high rates of distant metastasis. The value of adjuvant chemotherapy in bladder preservation was investigated in RTOG 97-06 [32]. Although the result was promising, less than half of the enrolled patients completed the designated treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not part of our treatment strategy in patients without pelvic node metastasis, even though a substantial proportion of extravesicle tumors in our study (T3 + T4 = 41.5%). Yet this did not jeopardize our OS rate. Unless randomized trial has proven NAC followed by CCRT and followed by chemotherapy is better CCRT alone, our upfront CCRT strategy will be continued.

Conclusions

Aim of bladder preservation therapy is to offer a quality of life treatment and avoid potential morbidity from chemotherapy or radiotherapy without compromising bladder preservation rate. Upfront CCRT with mild weekly cisplatin regimen without NAC or adjuvant chemotherapy could provide reasonable CR rate, OS and bladder preservation rate in T2-4N0 stage bladder cancer patients.

Notes

Abbreviations

TURBT: 

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor

RT: 

Radiotherapy

CCRT: 

Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy

3D-CRT: 

3D Conformal radiotherapy

IMRT: 

Intensity modulated radiotherapy

NAC: 

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

RTOG: 

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

OS: 

Overall survival

PFS: 

Progression-free survival

CR: 

Complete response

GU: 

Genitourinary

CT: 

Computed tomography

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

AJCC: 

American Joint Committee on Cancer

GTV: 

Gross tumor volume

CTV-H: 

Clinical target volumes at high risk

PTV-H: 

Planning target volume at high risk

CTV-M: 

Clinical target volume at intermediate risk

PTV-M: 

Planning target volume at intermediate risk

GFR: 

Glomerular filtration rate

RECIST: 

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

EORTC: 

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

SPSS: 

Statistical Package for Social Sciences software

PR: 

Partial response

GI: 

Gastrointestinal

MGH: 

Massechuses General Hospital

IGRT: 

Image guided radiotherapy.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Miss Su-Chen Huang for the administrative paperwork about Institutional Review Board of our hospital.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
(2)
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
(3)
Shu-Tien Urology Ophthalmology Clinic
(4)
School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University
(5)
School of Medicine and Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University

References

  1. Mak RH, Zietman AL, Heney NM, Kaufman DS, Shipley WU: Bladder preservation: optimizing radiotherapy and integrated treatment strategies. BJU Int 2008, 102: 1345-1353. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07981.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shelley MD, Barber J, Wilt T, Mason MD: Surgery versus radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002, CD002079.Google Scholar
  3. Tester W, Porter A, Asbell S, Coughlin C, Heaney J, Krall J, Martz K, Venner P, Hammond E: Combined modality program with possible organ preservation for invasive bladder carcinoma: results of RTOG protocol 85-12. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993, 25: 783-790. 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90306-GView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shipley WU, Winter KA, Kaufman DS, Lee WR, Heney NM, Tester WR, Donnelly BJ, Venner PM, Perez CA, Murray KJ, Doggett RS, True LD: Phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer treated with selective bladder preservation by combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy: initial results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 89-03. J Clin Oncol 1998, 16: 3576-3583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rodel C, Grabenbauer GG, Kuhn R, Papadopoulos T, Dunst J, Meyer M, Schrott KM, Sauer R: Combined-modality treatment and selective organ preservation in invasive bladder cancer: long-term results. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20: 3061-3071. 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. James ND, Hussain SA, Hall E, Jenkins P, Tremlett J, Rawlings C, Crundwell M, Sizer B, Sreenivasan T, Hendron C, Lewis R, Waters R, Huddart RA: Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 2012, 366: 1477-1488. 10.1056/NEJMoa1106106View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shipley WU, Kaufman DS, Tester WJ, Pilepich MV, Sandler HM: Overview of bladder cancer trials in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer 2003, 97: 2115-2119. 10.1002/cncr.11282View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunst J, Diestelhorst A, Kuhn R, Muller AC, Scholz HJ, Fornara P: Organ-sparing treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2005, 181: 632-637. 10.1007/s00066-005-1416-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaufman DS, Winter KA, Shipley WU, Heney NM, Wallace HJ 3rd, Toonkel LM, Zietman AL, Tanguay S, Sandler HM: Phase I-II RTOG study (99-06) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing transurethral surgery, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and twice-daily radiotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation or radical cystectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Urology 2009, 73: 833-837. 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.036View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kragelj B, Zaletel-Kragelj L, Sedmak B, Cufer T, Cervek J: Phase II study of radiochemotherapy with vinblastine in invasive bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2005, 75: 44-47. 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.01.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitin T, Hunt D, Shipley WU, Kaufman DS, Uzzo R, Wu CL, Buyyounouski MK, Sandler H, Zietman AL: Transurethral surgery and twice-daily radiation plus paclitaxel-cisplatin or fluorouracil-cisplatin with selective bladder preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (RTOG 0233): a randomised multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013, 14: 863-872. 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70255-9PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Turgeon GA, Souhami L, Cury FL, Faria SL, Duclos M, Sturgeon J, Kassouf W: Hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy in combined modality treatment for bladder preservation in elderly patients with invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014, 88: 326-331. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Caffo O, Fellin G, Graffer U, Luciani L: Assessment of quality of life after cystectomy or conservative therapy for patients with infiltrating bladder carcinoma. A survey by a self-administered questionnaire. Cancer 1996, 78: 1089-1097. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960901)78:5<1089::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-YView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fedeli U, Fedewa SA, Ward EM: Treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer: evidence from the National Cancer Database, 2003 to 2007. J Urol 2011, 185: 72-78. 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009, 45: 228-247. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF: Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 31: 1341-1346. 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-CView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawashima A, Nakayama M, Kakuta Y, Abe T, Hatano K, Mukai M, Nagahara A, Nakai Y, Oka D, Takayama H, Yoshioka T, Hoshida Y, Itatani H, Nishimura K, Nonomura N: Excision repair cross-complementing group 1 may predict the efficacy of chemoradiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011, 17: 2561-2569. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1963View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Efstathiou JA, Spiegel DY, Shipley WU, Heney NM, Kaufman DS, Niemierko A, Coen JJ, Skowronski RY, Paly JJ, McGovern FJ, Zietman AL: Long-term outcomes of selective bladder preservation by combined-modality therapy for invasive bladder cancer: the MGH experience. Eur Urol 2012, 61: 705-711. 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaufman DS, Winter KA, Shipley WU, Heney NM, Chetner MP, Souhami L, Zlotecki RA, Sause WT, True LD: The initial results in muscle-invading bladder cancer of RTOG 95-06: phase I/II trial of transurethral surgery plus radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by selective bladder preservation or cystectomy depending on the initial response. Oncologist 2000, 5: 471-476. 10.1634/theoncologist.5-6-471View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Caffo O, Veccia A, Fellin G, Russo L, Mussari S, Galligioni E: Trimodality treatment in the conservative management of infiltrating bladder cancer: a critical review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013, 86: 176-190. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.09.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, Skinner E, Bochner B, Thangathurai D, Mikhail M, Raghavan D, Skinner DG: Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19: 666-675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, Speights VO, Vogelzang NJ, Trump DL, de Vere White RW, Sarosdy MF, Wood DP Jr, Raghavan D, Crawford ED: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 2003, 349: 859-866. 10.1056/NEJMoa022148View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gamal El-Deen H, Elshazly HF, Abo Zeina EA: Clinical experience with radiotherapy alone and radiochemotherapy with platin based regimens in organ-sparing treatment of invasive bladder cancer. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2009, 21: 59-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koga F, Kihara K: Selective bladder preservation with curative intent for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a contemporary review. Int J Urol 2012, 19: 388-401. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02974.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shipley WU, Kaufman DS, Zehr E, Heney NM, Lane SC, Thakral HK, Althausen AF, Zietman AL: Selective bladder preservation by combined modality protocol treatment: long-term outcomes of 190 patients with invasive bladder cancer. Urology 2002, 60: 62-67. discussion 67-68View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu CE, Lin YC, Hong JH, Chuang CK, Pang ST, Liaw CC: Prognostic value of complete response in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Anticancer Res 2013, 33: 2605-2610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Peyromaure M, Slama J, Beuzeboc P, Ponvert D, Debre B, Zerbib M: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage T2 bladder cancer: report of a single institution. Urology 2004, 63: 73-77. 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Coen JJ, Paly JJ, Niemierko A, Kaufman DS, Heney NM, Spiegel DY, Efstathiou JA, Zietman AL, Shipley WU: Nomograms predicting response to therapy and outcomes after bladder-preserving trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013, 86: 311-316. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.020View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Catto JW, Azzouzi AR, Rehman I, Feeley KM, Cross SS, Amira N, Fromont G, Sibony M, Cussenot O, Meuth M, Hamdy FC: Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23: 2903-2910. 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.163View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Housset M: Concomitant chemoradiotherapy of infiltrating cancers of the bladder. Cancer Radiother 1998, 2: 713-717. 10.1016/S1278-3218(99)80013-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pos FJ, Hart G, Schneider C, Sminia P: Radical radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: What dose and fractionation schedule to choose? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 64: 1168-1173. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hagan MP, Winter KA, Kaufman DS, Wajsman Z, Zietman AL, Heney NM, Toonkel LM, Jones CU, Roberts JD, Shipley WU: RTOG 97-06: initial report of a phase I-II trial of selective bladder conservation using TURBT, twice-daily accelerated irradiation sensitized with cisplatin, and adjuvant MCV combination chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 57: 665-672. 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00718-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ploussard G, Daneshmand S, Efstathiou JA, Herr HW, James ND, Rodel CM, Shariat SF, Shipley WU, Sternberg CN, Thalmann GN, Kassouf W: Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014, 66: 120-137. 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.038View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Huddart RA, Hall E, Hussain SA, Jenkins P, Rawlings C, Tremlett J, Crundwell M, Adab FA, Sheehan D, Syndikus I, Hendron C, Lewis R, Waters R, James ND: Randomized noninferiority trial of reduced high-dose volume versus standard volume radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of the BC2001 trial (CRUK/01/004). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013, 87: 261-269. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2044PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kron T, Wong J, Rolfo A, Pham D, Cramb J, Foroudi F: Adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer reduces integral dose despite daily volumetric imaging. Radiother Oncol 2010, 97: 485-487. 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.07.023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Foroudi F, Wong J, Kron T, Rolfo A, Haworth A, Roxby P, Thomas J, Herschtal A, Pham D, Williams S, Tai KH, Duchesne G: Online adaptive radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 81: 765-771. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.061View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pos F, Bex A, Dees-Ribbers HM, Betgen A, van Herk M, Remeijer P: Lipiodol injection for target volume delineation and image guidance during radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009, 93: 364-367. 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stein JP, Penson DF, Cai J, Miranda G, Skinner EC, Dunn MA, Groshen S, Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG: Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer. J Urol 2007, 177: 876-881. discussion 881-872 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.043View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lee et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement