Long term results after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients with craniopharyngioma: maximal tumor control with minimal side effects
© Harrabi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 6 May 2014
Accepted: 30 June 2014
Published: 16 September 2014
There are already numerous reports about high local control rates in patients with craniopharyngioma but there are only few studies with follow up times of more than 10 years. This study is an analysis of long term control, tumor response and side effects after fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for patients with craniopharyngioma.
Patients and methods
55 patients who were treated with FSRT for craniopharyngioma were analyzed. Median age was 37 years (range 6–70 years), among them eight children < 18 years. Radiotherapy (RT) was indicated for progressive disease after neurosurgical resection or postoperatively after repeated resection or partial resection. A median dose of 52.2 Gy (50 – 57.6 Gy) was applied with typical dose per fraction of 1.8 Gy five times per week. The regular follow up examinations comprised in addition to contrast enhanced MRI scans thorough physical examinations and clinical evaluation.
During median follow up of 128 months (2 – 276 months) local control rate was 95.3% after 5 years, 92.1% after 10 years and 88.1% after 20 years. Overall survival after 10 years was 83.3% and after 20 years 67.8% whereby none of the deaths were directly attributed to craniopharyngioma. Overall treatment was tolerated well with almost no severe acute or chronic side effects. One patient developed complete anosmia, another one’s initially impaired vision deteriorated further. In 83.6% of the cases with radiological follow up a regression of irradiated tumor residues was monitored, in 7 cases complete response was achieved. 44 patients presented themselves initially with endocrinologic dysfunction none of them showed signs of further deterioration during follow up. No secondary malignancies were observed.
Long term results for patients with craniopharyngioma after stereotactic radiotherapy are with respect to low treatment related side effects as well as to local control and overall survival excellent.
KeywordsCraniopharyngioma FSRT Long-term results Side effects Radiological outcome
Craniopharyngioma are rare epithelial solid or mixed solid-cystic tumors which arise from remnants of the Rathke pouch mostly in the sellar or suprasellar region. Despite its benign histological appearance as WHO grade I tumor they often recur and lead to significant clinical impairment by compression of structures in close vicinity such as optic pathways, hypothalamus or pituitary stalk. Craniopharyngioma account for 1–3% of all intracranial neoplasm  and most commonly present in children between 5 and 14 years of age or again in adults between 50 and 75 years [2, 3]. Both neurosurgical and radiotherapeutical approaches are well established in the treatment of craniopharyngioma however the optimal treatment strategies are still discussed controversially [4, 5]. Surgery is usually considered the treatment of choice, especially in children. The extent of microsurgical resection is most important for long-term local control  however gross total resection often cannot be achieved without leading to severe hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction or visual impairment . Furthermore limited resection can be necessary to relieve acute symptoms of intracranial pressure. In the past, radiotherapy (RT) was applied mostly adjuvant after surgery or in case of recurrence however there are plenty studies providing data that RT alone is as effective in respect to local control [8–11]. Since life expectancy is long local control assumed minimizing long term treatment related side effects is of highest priority. Using modern techniques of RT such as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or treatment with charged particles enables the delivery of high doses necessary for tumor control while not exceeding tolerance doses of nearby risk organs such as the brainstem or optic chiasm and thereby preventing further endocrinologic or visual deficits; moreover, reduction of low to medium doses to adjacent normal tissue can be achieved. In previous studies we reported of safety and effectiveness of FSRT in patients with craniopharyngioma . The current study is a retrospective analysis of updated long-term clinical outcome and treatment-related side effects with particular regard to tumor response.
Methods and material
We evaluated 55 patients (28 female, 27 male, including 8 children < 18 years) who have been treated between 1989 and 2012 with FSRT for craniopharyngioma at our institution. Median age was 37 years (range 6 – 70). In all patients diagnosis was histologically confirmed. The majority of patients (70.9%, 39 of 55 patients) underwent RT with tumor progression/recurrence after surgery rather than adjuvantly after partial resection (29.1%, 16 of 55 patients).
All patients were immobilized by utilizing an individually manufactured mask system. In most cases an individually adapted scotch cast mask allowing a repositioning accuracy of 1 to 2 mm was used . From 1993 on all patients received both CT and MRI with slice thickness of 3 mm in mask fixation for treatment planning as described previously . Before then, only CT scans with stereotactic localization system were performed. After stereotactic guided image fusion (gross) target volume (GTV) was defined on each slice by outlining contrast enhanced T1-weighted solid lesions as well as all cystic components and their wall apparent in T2-weighted MRI scans. We defined the clinical target volume (CTV) for craniopharyngioma to be identical with the GTV. For safety reasons in regard to positioning accuracy a 2 mm margin was added for planning target volume (PTV). Treatment planning was performed by using the Stryker-LeibingerSystem STP, the Virtuos-Software or the Precisis-Software.
Radiotherapy was conducted at our institution using linear accelerators with 6 or 15 megaelectron volts designed for stereotactic RT. Details on treatment planning and dose calculation were reported previously at our institution . A median dose of 52.2 Gy (range 50 – 57.6 Gy) was applied in conventional fractionation with a median single dose of 1.8 Gy (range 1.8 – 2 Gy) 5 times per week using 3–5 individually collimated, non-coplanar, isocentric fields. The median PTV treated was 31.2 ml (range 6.2 to 138.9 ml). To account for possible changes of the target volume MRI scans were performed once during treatment in asymptomatic patients. In case of new clinical symptoms CT or MR imaging was performed more frequently.
Radiological outcome was classified in five grades by assessing maximal axial dimension in two orthogonal directions: complete response (CR) was defined as absence of detectable tumor residuum on MRI scans. Tumor diminution of > 50% was assessed as partial response (PR) and in case of reduction of tumor formation between 25 and 50% as objective response. Change of dimensions of less than 25% without signs of progression was categorized as stable disease. Additionally, similar to treatment planning all solid and cystic components visible on follow up MRI were taken into consideration and outlined on each slice separately to gain volumetric information and put them in relation to the pretherapeutic GTV.
All follow-up appointments consisted of complete physical examinations and clinical evaluation of endocrinologic, ophthalmologic and neurologic status in addition to neuroradiologic imaging. First visit was scheduled six weeks after completing RT, then patients were seen every quarter in the first year and every six months in the following years. Five years after RT intervals were prolonged to once a year. In case of follow up was continued at another facility our data was completed by consulting the attending physicians or contacting the patients themselves. Acute or chronic treatment related side effects were classified under the terms of common terminology criteria of adverse events (CTCAE, v4.043, June 14, 2010, available at http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html).
Overall survival was calculated from the time of first diagnosis up to the last follow-up visit or death by any cause. Local control rate was calculated from the onset of radiotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. (Sigma Plot, Systat Software GmbH).
Radiotherapy was completed in all 55 patients as intended. 39 patients underwent treatment because of recurrent or progressive craniopharyngioma after initial resection. The mean time between surgery and begin of radiotherapy was 40.7 months (range 6 – 256 months). Due to hydrocephalus after cyst enlargement treatment had to be interrupted in one patient after only two fractions. With a newly implanted ventriculo-peritoneal shunt in place and updated postoperative cerebral imaging treatment was replanned and could be continued without further complications. Apart from this case there were no other significant adverse events or incidents exceeding grade I according to CTCAE.
Median follow up time was 128 months (range 2 – 276 months). During this period two female patients (29 years, 51 years) presented with signs of shunt insufficiency three and 49 months after RT necessitating neurosurgical intervention. In both patients no progress of the craniopharyngioma could be seen by means of MRI. Due to perioperative complications one patient died after only two months of follow up and the other’s general condition deteriorated that no further MRI scans were performed hence the patient was censored after 49 months dying 88 months after RT. A third 25 year old female patient developed 21 months after RT focal neurological deficits, nausea and emesis as well due to shunt insufficiency. Once the ventriculo-peritoneal shunt was replaced the symptoms disappeared and no further interventions were necessary. At her last follow-up she was in good general condition with stable disease.
After receiving FSRT improvement of visual impairment was notable in six patients and only one 56 year old female patient who developed mild decrease of visual acuity. Prior to RT 44 patients suffered from endocrinopathies. It is worth mentioning that all patients had intact hormone function at the time of initial diagnosis and developed endocrinological deficiencies only postoperatively.
Radiological outcome 6 months after radiotherapy (as defined in methods and material)
Our study shows that long term outcome for patients with craniopharyngioma after being treated with FSRT is excellent as low treatment related side effects is concerned as well as local control rate and overall survival.
Optimal treatment strategy for craniopharyngioma has been subject to debate for a long time and is still discussed controversially [6, 12, 15, 16]. In the past, the recommended therapeutical approach consisted of attempted complete resection. However the tumor’s vicinity to vital structures such as the hypothalamus or the optic chiasm posed a major challenge for achieving this goal without inflicting severe morbidity [17, 18]. Even with advances of neurosurgical techniques such as implementation of microsurgery a primarily gross total resection is often associated with poor results with regard to endocrinological or neurocognitive outcome [7, 19]. In recent years less radical surgical approaches in combination with adjuvant treatment established . Especially in cases of subtotal resection RT has been performed with similar results in terms of local control and overall survival [21, 22]. However each strategy has its distinct treatment related risk profile; neurosurgical resection is associated with acute complications whereas RT-induced side effect may occur only after many years.
Yet the point in time of RT is still disputed. Should RT be reserved for tumor recurrence or rather be administered at first diagnosis not least because of excellent functional outcome? Regimen et al. reported of improved overall survival when treated primarily . Moon et al. recently suggested comparable results in overall survival for adjuvant RT, early or late . Similar findings were made by Pemberton et al. . The data provided by our analysis provide the evidence that FSRT is a safe and effective treatment option for achieving long term control without inflicting severe functional or hormonal impairment. Whether patients were treated early in the time course or received RT for tumor recurrence did not seem to make a difference for local control, overall survival or neurocognitive function.
With FSRT a reduction of safety margins is possible, thereby leading to a smaller PTV and sparing of normal tissue . The main rationale for target volume reduction is to decrease radiation induced long term complication such as secondary malignancies or impaired cognitive function. Particle therapy with protons offer several potential biological and physical advantages such as inverse depth dose profile leading to a steep dose gradient around the target volume. Thereby especially the low and medium dose regions could be minimized. Fitzek et al. presented an analysis of 15 patients treated with a combination of photon and proton irradiation for craniopharyngioma resulting in local control rates and overall survival comparable to other contemporary investigations . However the risk of new cyst formation and therewith alteration of PTV has to be taken into consideration for proton therapy.
FSRT leads to excellent results in patients with craniopharyngioma regarding local control, overall survival and preservation of organ function. Proton therapy may be able to further enhance the risk-benefit profile. Interdisciplinary treatment of these patients, especially in pediatric age, is strongly recommended to optimally decide on the sequence between wait-and-scan, surgery and/or radiation therapy.
Written consent was obtained from the patient or the patient’s parents for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.
We acknowledge the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg within the funding programme Open Access Publishing.
- Bunin GR, Surawicz TS, Witman PA, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner JM: The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 1998, 89: 547-551. 10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0547View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haupt RMC, Pavanello M, Caruso S, Dama E, Garrè ML: Epidemiological aspects of craniopharyngioma. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2006,19(Suppl 1):289-293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jane J Jr, Laws E: Craniopharyngioma. Pituitary 2006, 9: 323-326. 10.1007/s11102-006-0413-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark AJ, Cage TA, Aranda D, Parsa AT, Auguste KI, Gupta N: Treatment-related morbidity and the management of pediatric craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012, 10: 293-301. 10.3171/2012.7.PEDS11436View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller HL: Consequences of Craniopharyngioma Surgery in Children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011, 96: 1981-1991. 10.1210/jc.2011-0174View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee MH, Kim S-H, Seoul HJ, Nam D-H, Lee J-I, Park K, Kim J-H, Kong D-S: Impact of maximal safe resection on the clinical outcome of adults with craniopharyngiomas. J Clin Neurosci 2012, 19: 1005-1008. 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.09.033View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman HJ, Silva MD, Humphreys RP, Drake JM, Smith ML, Blaser SI: Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg 1992, 76: 47-52. 10.3171/jns.1992.76.1.0047View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wen BC, Hussey DH, Staples J, Hitchon PW, Jani SK, Vigliotti AP, Doornbos JF: A comparison of the roles of surgery and radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989, 16: 17-24. 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90005-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott RMHS, Barnes PD, Goumnerova L, Tarbell NJ: Surgery, radiation, and combination therapy in the treatment of childhood craniopharyngioma–a 20-year experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 1994,21(suppl 1):75-81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becker GKR, Skalej M, Bamberg M: The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of craniopharyngioma–indications, results, side effects. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 1999, 33: 100-113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jose CCRB, Ashley S, Marsh H, Brada M: Radiotherapy for the treatment of recurrent craniopharyngioma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1992,4(5):287-289. 10.1016/S0936-6555(05)81101-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Combs SE, Thilmann C, Huber PE, Hoess A, Debus J, Schulz-Ertner D: Achievement of long-term local control in patients with craniopharyngiomas using high precision stereotactic radiotherapy. Cancer 2007, 109: 2308-2314. 10.1002/cncr.22703View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menke M, Hirschfeld F, Mack T, Pastyr O, Sturm V, Schlegel W: Photogrammetric accuracy measurements of head holder systems used for fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994, 29: 1147-1155. 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90412-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Habermehl D, Debus J, Ganten T, Ganten M-K, Bauer J, Brecht I, Brons S, Haberer T, Haertig M, Jakel O, Parodi K, Welzel T, Combs SE: Hypofractionated carbon ion therapy delivered with scanned ion beams for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma - feasibility and clinical response. Radiat Oncol 2013, 8: 59. 10.1186/1748-717X-8-59PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stripp DCH, Maity A, Janss AJ, Belasco JB, Tochner ZA, Goldwein JW, Moshang T, Rorke LB, Phillips PC, Sutton LN, Shu H-KG: Surgery with or without radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas in children and young adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 58: 714-720. 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01570-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sughrue M, Yang I, Kane A, Fang S, Clark A, Aranda D, Barani I, Parsa A: Endocrinologic, neurologic, and visual morbidity after treatment for craniopharyngioma. J Neurooncol 2011, 101: 463-476. 10.1007/s11060-010-0265-yPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crom DB, Smith D, Xiong Z, Onar A, Hudson MM, Merchant TE, Morris EB: Health status in long-term survivors of pediatric craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosci Nurs 2010, 42: 323-328. 310.1097/JNN.1090b1013e3181f1098a1059d 10.1097/JNN.0b013e3181f8a59dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matson DD, Crigler JF: Management of craniopharyngioma in childhood*. J Neurosurg 1969, 30: 377-390. 10.3171/jns.1969.30.4.0377View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Kendall BE, Neville BGR, Stanhope R, Watkins KE, Hayward RD: Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted? J Neurosurg 1996, 85: 73-81. 10.3171/jns.1996.85.1.0073View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen M, Bartels U, Branson H, Kulkarni AV, Hamilton J: Trends in treatment and outcomes of pediatric craniopharyngioma, 1975–2011. Neuro Oncol 2013, 15: 767-774. 10.1093/neuonc/not026PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kramer S, McKissock W, Concannon JP: Craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 1961, 18: 217-226. 10.3171/jns.1961.18.2.0217View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang I, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Kaur R, Ivan ME, Aranda D, Barani IJ, Parsa AT: Craniopharyngioma: a comparison of tumor control with various treatment strategies. Neurosurg Focus 2010, 28: E5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Regine WF, Kramer S: Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: long term results of combined treatment with surgery and radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992, 24: 611-617. 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90705-MView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Combs SE, Thilmann C, Edler L, Debus J, Schulz-Ertner D: Efficacy of fractionated stereotactic reirradiation in recurrent gliomas: long-term results in 172 patients treated in a single institution. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23: 8863-8869. 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.4157View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Minniti G, Saran F, Traish D, Soomal R, Sardell S, Gonsalves A, Ashley S, Warrington J, Burke K, Mosleh-Shirazi A, Brada M: Fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy following conservative surgery in the control of craniopharyngiomas. Radiother Oncol 2007, 82: 90-95. 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.11.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masson-Cote L, Masucci GL, Atenafu EG, Millar B-A, Cusimano M, Croul S, Mason W, Laperriere NJ, Sahgal A: Long-term outcomes for adult craniopharyngioma following radiation therapy. Acta Oncol 2013, 52: 153-158. 10.3109/0284186X.2012.685525View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Regine WF, Mohiuddin M, Kramer S: Long-term results of pediatric and adult craniopharyngiomas treated with combined surgery and radiation. Radiother Oncol 1993, 27: 13-21. 10.1016/0167-8140(93)90039-BView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moon S, Kim I, Park S, Kim I, Hong S, Park C, Wang K, Cho B: Early adjuvant radiotherapy toward long-term survival and better quality of life for craniopharyngiomas—a study in single institute. Childs Nerv Syst 2005, 21: 799-807. 10.1007/s00381-005-1189-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pemberton LS, Dougal M, Magee B, Gattamaneni HR: Experience of external beam radiotherapy given adjuvantly or at relapse following surgery for craniopharyngioma. Radiother Oncol 2005, 77: 99-104. 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.04.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merchant TE, Kun LE, Hua C-H, Wu S, Xiong X, Sanford RA, Boop FA: Disease control after reduced volume conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy for childhood craniopharyngioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013, 85: e187-e192. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.030PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fitzek MM, Linggood RM, Adams J, Munzenrider JE: Combined proton and photon irradiation for craniopharyngioma: long-term results of the early cohort of patients treated at Harvard cyclotron laboratory and Massachusetts general hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 64: 1348-1354. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.034View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.