Open Access

XRCC1 codon 399Gln polymorphism is associated with radiotherapy-induced acute dermatitis and mucositis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

  • Haijun Li1,
  • Yanjie You2, 3,
  • Canfeng Lin1,
  • Mingzhang Zheng1,
  • Chaoqun Hong2,
  • Jiongyu Chen2,
  • Derui Li1,
  • William W Au4 and
  • Zhijian Chen1Email author
Contributed equally
Radiation Oncology20138:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-31

Received: 19 July 2012

Accepted: 29 January 2013

Published: 1 February 2013

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the 194 and 399 codons of XRCC1, and the risk of severe acute skin and oral mucosa reactions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in China.

Methods

114 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were sequentially recruited in this study. Heparinized peripheral blood samples were taken for SNPs analysis before the start of radiation treatment. SNPs in XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp and 399Arg/Gln) gene were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Dermatitis at upper neck and oral mucositis were clinically recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3.0.

Results

The variant allele frequencies were 0.289 for XRCC1 194Trp and 0.263 for XRCC1 399Gln. Of the 114 patients, 24 experienced grade 3 acute dermatitis and 48 had grade 3 acute mucositis. The XRCC1 399Arg/Gln was significantly associated with the development of grade 3 dermatitis (Odds Ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.04–6.73; p = 0.037, χ2 = 4.357). In addition, it was also associated with higher incidence of grade 3 mucositis with a borderline statistical significance (Odds Ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 0.951–4.66; p = 0.065, χ2 = 3.411). The relationship between XRCC1 194Arg/Trp and acute dermatitis, and mucositis was not found.

Conclusions

Our investigation shows, for the first time, that patients with the XRCC1 399Arg/Gln genotype were more likely to experience severe acute dermatitis and oral mucositis. With further validation, the information can be used to determine personalized radiotherapy strategy.

Keywords

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) X-ray cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) Radiotherapy Acute skin reactions Acute mucosa reactions

Background

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is prevalent in certain parts of the world: Southern China, North Africa, and parts of the Mediterranean basin [1]. Radiation therapy (RT) alone or in combination with chemotherapy are the standard treatments of NPC and the overall 5 year survival rate is between 59% and 85% [2, 3]. However, radiation-induced toxicity limits the use of higher doses to further improve efficacy. Balancing between treatment efficiency and toxicity of RT is always a dilemma to radiation oncologist.

The severity of RT-induced complication is associated with many factors: radiation dose, combined with chemotherapy, types of tissues, and microenvironment of involved tissues. However, similar patients who received similar or identical treatment protocols had substantially different degree of clinical side effects. Therefore, genetic component may contribute to the clinical radiosensitivity [46].

As RT exerts its cytotoxic effects through damage to cells, proteins, and DNA, individual variations in the repair of DNA damage may modify the response of normal tissues [7]. Polymorphisms of X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1), a base excision repair (BER) gene, was shown to affect DNA repair activity, cell cycle progression, and sensitivity to bleomycin, a radiation-mimicking agent that induces double-strand breaks in DNA [8, 9].

In NPC patients, the 399Gln variant XRCC1 gene was reported to be associated with lower grade fibrosis after radiation therapy in a small number of patients [10]. Using immunohistochemical techniques, the lack of ERCC1 staining was associated with increased radiosensitivity [11]. On the other hand, high staining intensity of the ERCC1 protein was associated with poor loco-regional control of the carcinoma [12]. Clearly, these studies do not provide consistent or adequate information on radiosensitivity that can be used to modify therapeutic protocols. Therefore, we have conducted our study using an enhanced experimental design.

Numerous studies have examined the association of DNA repair SNPs with acute and late RT normal tissue effects. XRCC1 gene was the one frequently investigated in DNA repair gene family. The results of association between XRCC1 SNP and radio- response were in consistent [13]. From this point, we have conducted this genetic polymorphism study on relevant XRCC1 alleles. In addition, we associated the polymorphisms with acute mucositis and dermatitis which are common side-effects from radiation therapy among NPC patients.

Methods

Patient characteristics and clinical parameters

Between Nov, 2009 and Dec, 2010, 114 patients with histologically confirmed NPC were recruited to this study in the Cancer Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, China. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was obtained from all patients enrolled. Patients without systemic metastasis and receiving definite RT alone or combined with chemotherapy were eligible to the study. In the period of study, totally 380 consecutive patients were eligible to the study. Among them, 114 patients consented to the study.

Evaluation by physical examination, nasopharyngeal endoscope, Magnetic Resonance Imaging of nasopharynx and neck, chest X-ray, and abdominal ultrasonography were routinely performed for tumor staging. Skeletal scanning by single photon emission computed tomography was selected to patients with stage N2-3 disease. The overall stage distribution was 11.4% (13/114) for stages II; 40.4% (46/114) for stage III; and 48.2% (55/114) for stages IV by AJCC staging system V7 [14].

The enrolled patients consisted of 36 females and 78 males with age of 19–76 (mean 49.6, SD 11.9). One hundred and twelve patients had World Health Organization (WHO) type II or III tumor. Two had WHO type I tumor. Ninety-five patients received combined chemo-radiotherapy with cisplatin-based single or doublet scheme, and 19 received radiotherapy alone. The combination strategies were selected based on tumor stage and patient’s performance status. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were used for radiotherapy. In using 3D-CRT, the prescription doses were 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions (Fs) (70Gy/35Fs) to primary tumor, 68Gy/34Fs to involved cervical drainage regions, and 50Gy/25Fs to uninvolved cervical drainage regions. In using IMRT, the prescription doses were 70Gy/32-33Fs to primary tumor, 66-68Gy/32-33Fs to cervical nodular lesions, 60Gy/32-33Fs to involved cervical drainage regions, and 54Gy/32-33Fs to uninvolved cervical drainage regions. All radiotherapies were delivered once daily, 5 days weekly.

Study endpoints

Radiation-induced acute dermatitis and mucositis were the endpoints of this study. The upper neck was selected as evaluation area, considering all patients received irradiation to their upper neck. In addition, the foldless skin of upper neck might eliminate the unplanned extra dose to the folded region caused by build-up effect of beams. The acute dermatitis and mucositis were scored by the Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) for adverse events v3.0 scale [15]. The highest grade of toxicity was chosen as the reference value. It was evaluated and documented weekly from the beginning to the end of radiotherapy. All scores of dermatitis and mucositis were confirmed by the same senior consultant physician as to eliminate the observer bias.

Calculation of radiation doses to interesting regions

The irradiation dose to the observed skin areas was generated by the method reported in the literature previously [6]. Briefly, a rim of 5mm beneath the external contour of upper neck was created and used as a surrogate for the epidermis and dermis, which extended to the edge of mandible cranially and level C6 vertebra caudally. The average dose to the rim was calculated to represent the doses received by the observed skin. The average dose to oral cavity was taken as the reference dose received by oral mucosa. In axis CT image, the region between the outer edge of gum and anterior edge of tonsillar fossa was contoured as oral cavity, which extended from the floor of the mouth to the hard palate and soft palate. All contouring and calculations were performed using the Pinnacle3® (version 8.0m) treatment planning system (Phillips, Madison, WI, US).

Genotyping analysis

A heparinized peripheral blood sample of 1ml was taken before the start of treatments. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using the TIANamp Extraction Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The polymorphic sites in XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp and 399Arg/Gln) were analyzed by Polymerase Chain Reaction–Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR- RFLP) using Plantinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China) for PCR and PvuII and MspI (NEB, Beijing, China) for digestion as reported in literature [8]. In addition, 10% of randomly selected samples were sequenced to verify genotyping results and 100% concordance was found.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Each polymorphism was tested for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by comparing the observed and expected genotype frequencies using the chi-square test with 1° of freedom. A p value of 0.05 or less (in a two-sided test) was considered statistically significant. Patients were subdivided according to their CTC score of dermatitis and mucositis. Patients who experienced episodes of grade 3 or higher toxicity were defined as radiation sensitive (Grade 3) and those with milder toxicity were defined as radiation insensitive (Grade 1–2). The Grade 3 vs. Grade 1–2 frequencies were examined by calculating the odds ratios (OR), with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using the chi-square test, with that of wild-type alleles as the reference.

The effect of age, gender, smoking, alcohol drinking, body mass index, tumor stage, radiotherapy technique, and radiation dose to observed tissue volumes on clinical radiosensitivity was also evaluated using the student's t test or the chi-square test.

Results

Over all acute reactions of skin and oral mucosa

Acute radiation-induced dermatitis in the upper neck and mucositis in the oral cavity were the clinical endpoints of this study. Of the 114 patients, 31 (27.2%) experienced grade 1, 59 (51.8%) grade 2, and 24 (21.1%) grade 3 skin toxicity. In addition, 24 (21.1%) had grade 1, 42 (36.8%) grade 2, and 48 (42.1%) grade 3 acute oral mucositis. There was no grade 4 or grade 5 toxicities of skin or mucosa observed during the treatment.

Distribution of allele frequencies for XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp and 399Arg/Gln)

Overall, the variant allele frequencies were 0.289 for XRCC1 194Trp and 0.263 for XRCC1 399Gln. All the genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p>0.05 at the chi-square for each allele).

Because of low frequency (<10%) of the genotypes of XRCC1 (194 Trp/Trp) and XRCC1 (399 Gln/Gln), we did not calculate the association between each of these genotypes and acute reactions.

Polymorphisms in XRCC1 gene and skin reaction

Table 1 shows the distribution of alleles Arg/Trp, Arg/Trp or Trp/Trp for XRCC1 at codon 194. Compared with XRCC1 194 Arg/Arg (wild-type), the XRCC1 194Arg/Trp was associated with lower incidence of grade 3 acute skin toxicity. The risk odds rate was 0.70 or less. However, the difference was not statistically significant.
Table 1

Association of polymorphisms in XRCC1 and the risk of acute dermatitis

 

Dermatitis

  

Genotype

Grade 1–2

Grade 3

OR (95% CI)

p value

XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp)

    

Arg/Arg (wild-type)

41

14

1.00 (ref)

 

Arg/Trp

42

10

0.697 (0.278–1.75)

0.440

Trp/Trp

7

0

NC

NC

XRCC1 (399Arg/Gln)

    

Arg/Arg (wild-type)

53

10

1.00 (ref)

 

Arg/Gln

28

14

2.65 (1.04–6.73)

0.037

Gln/Gln

9

0

NC

NC

Abbreviations: ref = reference; NC = not calculated; OR = Odds ratio; 95%CI = 95% confidence interval.

The XRCC1 399Arg/Gln was associated with high risk of grade 3 skin toxicity, OR = 2.65 (95% CI: 1.04–6.73), compared to the wild-type. It was statistically significant as tested by the chi-square test (p = 0.037, χ2 = 4.357).

Polymorphisms in XRCC1 gene and reaction of oral mucosa

In Table 2, the results show that the XRCC1 194Arg/Trp was associated with lower incidence of grade 3 acute oral mucositis, compared with the Arg/Arg allele. But it was not statistically significant.
Table 2

Association of polymorphisms in XRCC1 and the risk of acute oral mucositis

 

Mucositis

  

Genotype

Grade 1–2

Grade 3

OR (95% CI)

p value

XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp)

    

Arg/Arg (wild-type)

31

24

1.00 (ref)

 

Arg/Trp

33

19

0.744 (0.342–1.62)

0.454

Trp/Trp

2

5

NC

NC

XRCC1 (399Arg/Gln)

    

Arg/Arg (wild-type)

40

23

1.00 (ref)

 

Arg/Gln

19

23

2.11 (0.951–4.66)

0.065

Gln/Gln

7

2

NC

NC

Abbreviations: ref = reference; NC = not calculated; OR = Odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

Compared to the wild type, XRCC1 399Arg/Gln was associated with higher incidence of grade 3 oral mucosa toxicity, OR = 2.11 (95% CI: 0.951-4.66). The difference was borderline statistically significant, as tested by chi-square (p = 0.065, χ2 = 3.411).

Clinical factors and acute reactions

The relationship between acute reaction of skin and mucus, and factors of age, gender, smoking, alcohol drinking, body mass index, tumor stage, and chemotherapy, radiotherapy technology, and radiation dose to observed tissue volumes were also evaluated with univariate analyses. No linkage between the observed endpoint and the above mentioned factors were found (details are shown in Table 3).
Table 3

Association of clinical factors and the risk of acute skin and oral mucosa reactions

 

Dermatitis

 

Mucositis

 
 

Grade 1–2

Grade 3

pvalue

Grade 1–2

Grade 3

p value

Age (year)

Mean±SD

49.3±12.3

50.8±10.2

0.587

48.2±12.5

51.5±10.7

0.144

Gender

      

Male

61

17

0.775

48

30

0.246

Female

29

7

 

18

18

 

Drinking

      

Yes

8

1

0.737

4

5

0.617

No

82

23

 

62

43

 

Smoking

      

Yes

49

12

0.698

36

25

0.795

No

41

12

 

30

23

 

Body mass index

≤25

73

20

1.00

55

38

0.571

>25

17

4

 

11

10

 

T-staging

T1

8

1

0.418

5

4

0.474

T2

27

5

 

22

10

 

T3

29

7

 

18

18

 

T4

26

11

 

21

16

 

N-staging

N0

10

0

0.240

8

2

0.219

N1

19

5

 

12

12

 

N2

46

12

 

36

22

 

N3

15

7

 

10

12

 

Chemotherapy

Yes

77

21

1.00

55

43

0.343

No

13

3

 

11

5

 

Radiotherapy technique

3D-CRT

40

8

0.327

29

19

0.642

IMRT

50

16

 

37

29

 

Irradiation Dose (Gy)

Mean±SD

42.37±5.09

43.16±4.43

0.493

29.48±10.16

30.92±10.38

0.460

Abbreviations: IMRT = intensity-modulated radiotherapy; 3D-CRT = three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, SD = Standard deviation. Gy=Gray.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first investigation of genetic association between variants in XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp and 399Arg/Gln) and the risk of acute skin reaction and mucosa toxicity in NPC patients treated with RT. The other one studies involved tissue fibrosis and genotype analysis with much smaller sample size [10].

In our study, the frequencies of the variant alleles were 0.289 (XRCC1-194Arg/Trp) and 0.263 (XRCC1-399Arg/Gln), which were consistent with the previous literature data in Chinese subjects [16, 17]. However, the allele frequencies were different from those previously reported in Caucasian populations (the variant alleles were 0.06-0.07 and 0.36-0.37) [18, 19].

In this study, our data demonstrate that the risk of severe acute dermatitis up to grade 3 after radiotherapy could be increased by 2.65-fold in patients carrying with the XRCC1 399Arg/Gln genotype. There was no association between the XRCC1 194Arg/Trp genotype and skin reaction.

Although our observations have not been reported previously, they are strongly supported by information from relevant publications. The XRCC1 399Arg/Gln genotype has been reported to be associated with radiation sensitivity [8], mutagen sensitivity [9] and risk for lung cancer [20]. Furthermore, in a genotype-phenotype investigation, Au et al. [21] reported that the XRCC1 399Arg/Gln genotype was associated with reduced repair capacity for radiation-induced DNA damage but with normal repair of UV-light induced damage compared with the wild-type genotype. On the other hand, the XRCC1 194Arg/Trp genotype had repair activities similar to that of the wild-type. Therefore, our observations are likely to be real. Regarding the effects of the polymorphism of XRCC1 on oral mucositis, there was no report about the association between XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp and 399Arg/Gln) genotypes and oral mucositis in the literature. However, polymorphisms in XRCC3 were not associated with risk of oral mucositis [6].

Our results also showed that patients carrying with the XRCC1 (399Arg/Gln) genotype trended to have higher incidence of grade 3 oral mucositis. The odds ratio was 2.11 (p = 0.065, χ2 = 3.411). We did not find the relationship between polymorphism of XRCC1 (194Arg/Trp) and oral mucositis. This further demonstrated that the XRCC1 (399Arg/Gln) genotypes was linked to increased susceptibility of normal tissues to irradiation.

In the published literature, three reports were found which demonstrated the specific contribution of XRCC1 399Gln towards the expression of radiosensitivity. The first two reports by Hu et al. [8, 22] showed that extensive radiation-induced cell cycle delay was associated with the variant gene in cells from normal individuals and from breast cancer patients. The third report [21] is from our co-author who demonstrated that the variant gene showed DNA repair of radiation-induced but not UV-induced DNA damage. However, whether the repair was normal or not was not investigated. Therefore, these three reports, in combination, revealed that the variant gene may have abnormal DNA repair function (e.g. mistakes in repair) which can cause radiosensitivity. In this context, the three reports validate our observation of radiation sensitivity towards dermatitis and mucositis in our patients.

Conclusions

In summary, our study illustrates, for the first time, that patients with the XRCC1 (399Arg/Gln) genotype were more likely to experience severe acute radiation-induced dermatitis and oral mucositis after radiation therapy. With further validation, the genotype information may be useful in determining personalized radiotherapy strategy.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
(2)
Central laboratory, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
(3)
Cancer research center, Shantou University Medical College
(4)
Faculty of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College

References

  1. Chan AT, Teo PM, Johnson PJ: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2002, 13: 1007-1015. 10.1093/annonc/mdf179View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yeh SA, Tang Y, Lui CC, et al.: Treatment outcomes and late complications of 849 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005,62(3):672-679. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Xiao WW, Han F, Lu TX, et al.: Treatment outcomes after radiotherapy alone for patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009,74(4):1070-1076. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentzen SM, Overgaard J: Patient-to-patient variability in the expression of radiation-induced normal tissue injury. Semin Radiat Oncol 1994,4(2):68-80. 10.1016/S1053-4296(05)80034-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tucker SL, Turesson I, Thames HD: Evidence for individual differences in the radiosensitivity of human skin. Eur J Cancer 1992,28A(11):1783-1791.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Werbrouck J, De Ruyck K, Duprez F, et al.: Acute normal tissue reactions in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT: influence of dose and association with genetic polymorphisms in DNA DSB repair genes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009,73(4):1187-1195. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.073View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoeijmakers JH: Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001,411(6835):366-374. 10.1038/35077232View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu JJ, Smith TR, Miller MS, et al.: Amino acid substitution variants of APE1 and XRCC1 genes associated with ionizing radiation sensitivity. Carcinogenesis 2001,22(6):917-922. 10.1093/carcin/22.6.917View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang Y, Spitz MR, Zhu Y, et al.: From genotype to phenotype: correlating XRCC1 polymorphisms with mutagen sensitivity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003,2(8):901-908. 10.1016/S1568-7864(03)00085-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Alsbeih G, Al-Harbi N, Al-Hadyan K, et al.: Association between normal tissue complications after radiotherapy and polymorphic variations in TGFB1 and XRCC1 genes. Radiat Res 2010,173(4):505-511. 10.1667/RR1769.1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sun JM, Ahn MJ, Park MJ, et al.: Expression of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 as predictive marker for nasopharyngeal cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011,80(3):655-660. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.061View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan SH, Cheung FM, Ng WT, et al.: Can the analysis of ERCC1 expression contribute to individualized therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011,79(5):1414-1420. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.072View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Parliament MB, Murray D: Single nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA repair genes as predictors of radioresponse. Semin Radiat Oncol 2010,20(4):232-240. 10.1016/j.semradonc.2010.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition. New York, NY: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. . Published date: August 9, 2006 http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf
  16. Zhou L, Xia J, Li H, et al.: Association of XRCC1 variants with acute skin reaction after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2010,25(6):681-685. 10.1089/cbr.2010.0811View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hao B, Wang H, Zhou K, et al.: Identification of genetic variants in base excision repair pathway and their associations with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 2004,64(12):4378-4384. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0372View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang-Claude J, Popanda O, Tan XL, et al.: Association between polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes, XRCC1, APE1, and XPD and acute side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2005,11(13):4802-4809. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2657View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Moullan N, Cox DG, Angèle S, et al.: Polymorphisms in the DNA repair gene XRCC1, breast cancer risk, and response to radiotherapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003,12(11 Pt 1):1168-1174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Harms C, Salama SA, Sierra-Torres CH, et al.: Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, chromosome aberrations and lung cancer. Environ Mol Mutag 2004,44(1):74-82. 10.1002/em.20031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Au WW, Salama SA, Sierra-Torres CH: Functional characterization of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes using cytogenetic challenge assays. Environ Health Perspest 2003,111(15):1843-1850. 10.1289/ehp.6632View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu JJ, Smith TR, Miller MS, et al.: Genetic regulation of ionizing radiation sensitivity and breast cancer risk. Environ Mol Mutagen 2002,39(2–3):208-215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement