Skip to content

Advertisement

Radiation Oncology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Long term control of a maxillary sinus mucoepidermoid carcinoma with low dose radiation therapy: a case report

  • Horia Vulpe1Email author,
  • Meredith Giuliani1,
  • David Goldstein3,
  • Bayardo Perez-Ordonez2,
  • Laura A Dawson1 and
  • Andrew Hope1
Radiation Oncology20138:251

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-251

Received: 29 September 2013

Accepted: 24 October 2013

Published: 29 October 2013

Abstract

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxillary sinus is a rare malignancy of the head and neck. The location of this tumour near vital structures and its large size at presentation makes surgical resection with negative margins challenging. In incurable cases, relief from symptoms such as epistaxis may be achieved with radiation therapy. We present a case of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxillary sinus that was effectively palliated with a short course of radiation therapy, achieving complete cessation of bleeding, decrease in tumour size, and long term control. We surveyed the literature on mucoepidermoid carcinomas and propose that some tumours may be particularly radiosensitive, benefiting from even short courses of radiation therapy.

Keywords

Mucoepidermoid carcinomaRadiotherapyHead and neckPalliation

Background

Paranasal sinus malignancies account for 3-5% of all head and neck cancers [1, 2]. The vast majority are squamous cell carcinomas; non-squamous histologies are rare. In a retrospective review of 220 nasal and paranasal sinus carcinomas, the most frequent histologic type was squamous cell carcinoma (126 patients), followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma (35), undifferentiated carcinoma (30) and adenocarcinoma (25); only four were mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC) [1].

Histologically, MECs include at least three cell types: epidermoid cells, mucous cells and intermediate cells [3, 4]. MECs usually originate in the major salivary glands of the head and neck but may also develop in any of the 500–1000 minor salivary glands lining the upper aerodigestive tract, including the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses [5]. MECs are reported within paranasal sinuses [1, 4, 68], but they remain extremely rare [24], and are often grouped with non-squamous carcinomas of different histologic types, grades and sites. This makes it difficult to summarize the characteristics, epidemiology and behaviour of paranasal sinus MECs as a distinct entity.

In general, paranasal sinus malignancies of all histologies are more common in males (1.6-2.0:1; M:F) and the median age of diagnosis is between 50–70 years of age [1, 2]. These tumours usually present with advanced stage because expansion within the air-filled sinuses typically causes nonspecific symptoms such as pain, a palpable mass, congestion, swelling, dysphagia and epistaxis [1, 2, 7, 9, 10]. All histologic types combined, malignancies of the paranasal sinuses present with locally advanced T3/4 disease in 70-88% of cases [1, 2]. Data on the distinct presentation of MECs is sparse because they are often pooled with other salivary gland tumours. There is nevertheless some evidence that they are diagnosed equally late. Bhattacharyya extracted 15 cases of maxillary sinus MEC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and found that 80% presented at advanced tumour stage [11]. Dulguerov et al. report that glandular carcinomas of the maxillary sinus (35 adenoid cystic and four MECs) presented with T3/4 disease 70.3% of the time [1].

Once diagnosed, the large size of the tumour puts it in proximity of vital structures such as the eye, optic nerve, cavernous sinuses and brain. Achieving negative surgical margins may be technically difficult and, in incurable cases, relief from symptoms may be achieved with palliative external radiation therapy. We report here on a case of maxillary sinus MEC which displayed impressive radiosensitivity to low, palliative doses of radiation therapy.

Case presentation

An 84 year old lady was referred to a local otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon for a history of epistaxis, occasional hemoptysis, difficulty swallowing, and a fetid odor. She denied pain or significant distress related to these symptoms. She did not drink, smoke or have any known family history of cancer.

Her medical history included resection of a maxillary sinus mass 45 years prior, in a different country. The patient was unaware of the diagnosis and her previous medical records could not be obtained. The prior surgery left her with a surgical defect in the hard palate.

On presentation, her physical exam revealed numbness in the left V2 distribution as well as left sided proptosis. Extra-ocular movements were normal and palpation of the neck did not reveal any lymphadenopathy. Oral and endoscopic examinations showed a surgical defect in the left hard palate extending into the maxillary sinus and a mass visible in the left nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. The remainder of the upper aerodigestive tract was unremarkable.

Computed tomography of the head and neck revealed a large heterogeneous and vascular mass at the center of the left maxillary sinus with destruction of the medial, inferior and lateral walls; destruction of the left side of the hard palate; infiltration of the pterygopalatine fissure and infratemporal fossa as well as extension into the nasal cavity. The tumour extended into the left ethmoid air cells, breaching the medial wall of the orbit but remained extraconal, without intracranial extension (Figure 1). MRI further demonstrated mass effect on the ocular musculature causing proptosis and bilateral prominent retropharyngeal nodes suspicious for nodal metastases. The maximum diameter of the mass was 6.5 cm. There was no evidence of distant metastasis on systemic staging.
Figure 1

Coronal head and neck computed tomography (left) and magnetic resonance imaging (right) showing tumour size at presentation.

Pathologic examination of the biopsy specimen demonstrated small cysts lined by numerous mucous cells, large numbers of polygonal clear cells and smaller intermediate cells with round nuclei and small nucleoli (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with an intermediate grade (II/III) mucoepidermoid carcinoma.
Figure 2

Left: Intermediate grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma showing small cysts lined by numerous mucous cells (H&E stain, 200X). Right: Intermediate grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma composed of large numbers of polygonal clear cells and smaller intermediate cells with round nuclei and small nucleoli (H&E stain and, 200X).

The patient’s case was presented at multidisciplinary rounds and based on the extent of disease, patient performance status and the morbidity related to surgical resection the consensus was not to recommend curative surgery. Rather, the recommendation was for palliative endoscopic debulking to improve proptosis as well as palliative radiation therapy either as an alternative or in conjunction with endoscopic debulking. The patient declined initial treatment but then opted for radiotherapy alone 18 months later when bleeding from the tumour became unmanageable.

She received 700 cGy to the tumour using a right anterior oblique and left posterior oblique conformal beam arrangement (Figure 3). Within one week she achieved complete cessation of bleeding, decrease in bulk of her tumour and improved eating. She continued to have some discomfort from the lesion and underwent a second fraction of 700 cGy seven days later. This second fraction used a left lateral, right lateral and right anterior oblique beam arrangement to limit dose the brainstem and optic chiasm. The lenses were largely avoided to prevent morbidity from pain and dry eyes. Estimated cumulative maximal doses to organs at risk were 909 cGy to the brainstem, 1073 cGy to the optic chiasm, 795 cGy to the left eye, 1141 cGy to the right eye, 266 cGy to the left lens and 379 cGy to the right lens. Bleeding did not recur and her capacity to swallow improved as the mass shrunk in size. Given the excellent palliative result, a third planned fraction was not delivered. Her only side-effect from radiation was mild mucositis, which resolved within two weeks.
Figure 3

First radiation treatment plan showing isodose distribution on axial, coronal and sagittal images. The patient received 700 cGy to the gross tumour volume (yellow isodose line) using right anterior oblique and left posterior oblique conformal beam arrangement.

Follow-up CT two years later revealed a tumour clearly smaller in size measuring 4.5 cm. It abutted the floor of the left orbit, which had been previously displaced and infiltrated by tumour (Figure 4). There were no suspicious lymph nodes. At last follow-up, a little more than four years following completion of radiation therapy, the patient did not have any evidence of progression of her tumour. She continued to have eating difficulties due to the palatal defect which no longer was filled with tumour, but declined to use an obturator. Gastrostomy tube insertion was attempted but subsequently removed at the patient’s request. She maintains caloric intake with liquid nutritional supplements.
Figure 4

Sequential computed tomography between September 2007 and November 2011 showing decrease in tumour size after a short course of radiation therapy delivered in June 2009.

Discussion

Loco-regional control remains of crucial importance in incurable cases of head and neck cancer. Tumour extension into vital structures such as the oral cavity, airway and orbit can be extremely morbid causing impairment in basic human functions and significant disfigurement. Palliative radiation therapy (RT) aims to improve symptoms related to locoregional tumour spread while potentially slowing or halting tumour progression. Because both RT and the patient’s malignancy may cause debilitating side-effects, it can be difficult to find balance between improving quality of life and causing further symptoms such as pain, mucositis and dysphagia. For this reason palliative radiation regimens for head and neck cancer are individualized to each patient based on factors such as performance status and life expectancy [10].

A variety of radiation schedules exist but optimal dose and fractionation scheme remain to be elucidated. Although several trials and reviews have studied palliative radiation therapy regimens in head and neck cancers [9, 1214], these usually contain few, if any, MECs. Chen et al. analyzed 60 patients with SCC of the head and neck treated with various palliative RT regimens and found that the RTOG 85–02 schedule (4440 cGy using 370 cGy fractionation, administered twice a day for 2 consecutive days at 2- to 3-week intervals for 3 total cycles) was associated with the least toxicity, while being equally effective.

Whether this also applies to MECs is unclear and there is generally little consensus on the radiosensitivity of this tumour [1517]. There is emerging evidence that MECs may exhibit better response to radiation therapy than previously thought in both the curative and palliative setting. A retrospective review from the Princess Margaret Hospital analyzed patients treated with palliative RT to the head and neck and found that patients with non-squamous histologies (including five MECs) had increased overall survival (OS) as compared to SCC (HR 0.52 CI: 0.28–0.96) [10]. In a large retrospective review of 220 patients with nasal and paranasal sinus carcinomas, 5-year carcinoma specific actuarial survival was 79% for patients with glandular carcinoma (mucoepidermoid and adenoid cystic) versus 60% for those with squamous cell carcinoma [1]. A Japanese case report describes a MEC of the larynx that completely responded to curative doses of RT [18].

To our knowledge this is the first case report of a MEC treated with low, palliative doses of radiotherapy, resulting in partial response and long term control for more than four years. This report contributes to the small amount of existing evidence that MECs may be particularly radiosensitive. Consideration should be given to short courses of palliative RT in the management of patients with locally advanced disease who are not suitable for curative treatment, as even low doses may lead to palliation of symptoms and sustained tumor control.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto
(2)
Department of Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto
(3)
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto

References

  1. Dulguerov P, Jacobsen MS, Allal AS, Lehmann W, Calcaterra T: Nasal and paranasal sinus carcinoma: are we making progress? A series of 220 patients and a systematic review. Cancer 2001, 92: 3012-3029. 10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<3012::AID-CNCR10131>3.0.CO;2-EView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Myers LL, Nussenbaum B, Bradford CR, Teknos TN, Esclamado RM, Wolf GT: Paranasal sinus malignancies: an 18-year single institution experience. Laryngoscope 2002, 112: 1964-1969. 10.1097/00005537-200211000-00010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandwein MS, Ivanov K, Wallace DI, et al.: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma - a clinicopathologic study of 80 patients with special reference to histological grading. Am J Surg Pathol 2001, 25: 835-845. 10.1097/00000478-200107000-00001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ozawa H, Tomita T, Sakamoto K, et al.: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck: clinical analysis of 43 patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2008, 38: 414-418. 10.1093/jjco/hyn045View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Strick MJ, Kelly C, Soames JV, McLean NR: Malignant tumours of the minor salivary glands - a 20 year review. Br J Plast Surg 2004, 57: 624-631. 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.04.017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ozsaran Z, Yalman D, Baltalarli B, Anacak Y, Esassolak M, Haydaroglu A: Radiotherapy in maxillary sinus carcinomas: evaluation of 79 cases. Rhinology 2003, 41: 44-48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Perez D, Pires FR, Lopes MA, de Almeida OP, Kowalski LP: Adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: report of a 44-year experience of 25 cases from a single Institution. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006, 64: 1592-1597. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pires FR, de Almeida OP, de Araujo VC, Kowalski LP: Prognostic factors in head and neck mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Archives Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2004, 130: 174-180. 10.1001/archotol.130.2.174View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen AM, Vaughan A, Narayan S, Vijayakurnar S: Palliative radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: toward an optimal fractionation scheme. Head Neck-J Sci Specialties Head Neck 2008, 30: 1586-1591.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Stevens CM, Huang SH, Fung S, et al.: Retrospective study of palliative radiotherapy in newly diagnosed head and neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011, 81: 958-963. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.055View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacharyya N: Survival and staging characteristics for non-squamous cell malignancies of the maxillary sinus. Archives Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2003, 129: 334-337. 10.1001/archotol.129.3.334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mohanti BK, Umapathy H, Bahadur S, Thakar A, Pathy S: Short course palliative radiotherapy of 20 Gy in 5 fractions for advanced and incurable head and neck cancer: AIIMS study. Radiother Oncol 2004, 71: 275-280. 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.03.009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Paris KJ, Spanos WJ, Lindberg RD, Jose B, Albrink F: Phase I-II study of multiple daily fractions for palliation of advanced head and neck malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993, 25: 657-660. 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90012-KView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schleicher UM, Andreopoulos D, Ammon J: Palliative radiotherapy in recurrent head-and-neck tumors by a percutaneous superfractionated treatment schedule. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 50: 65-68. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01567-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Le QT, Birdwell S, Terris DJ, et al.: Postoperative irradiation of minor salivary gland malignancies of the head and neck. Radiother Oncol 1999, 52: 165-171. 10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00084-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Amdur RJ, Werning JW, Villaret DB: Radiotherapy alone or combined with surgery for salivary gland carcinoma. Cancer 2005, 103: 2544-2550. 10.1002/cncr.21083View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hosokawa Y, Shirato H, Kagei K, et al.: Role of radiotherapy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland. Oral Oncol 1999, 35: 105-111. 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00053-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shonai T, Hareyama M, Sakata K, et al.: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the larynx: a case which responded completely to radiotherapy and a review of the literature. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1998, 28: 339-342. 10.1093/jjco/28.5.339View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vulpe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement