Open Access

The pattern of relapse and survival of elective irradiation of the upper neck for stage N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Xiayun He1, 2,
  • Ziqiang Pan1, 2,
  • Xiaomao Guo1, 2,
  • Ming Ye3,
  • Zhen Zhang1, 2, 4Email author,
  • Shaoqin He1, 2 and
  • Taifu Liu1, 2
Contributed equally
Radiation Oncology20127:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-35

Received: 6 November 2011

Accepted: 19 March 2012

Published: 19 March 2012

Abstract

Background

To investigate patterns of failure and survival rates of elective irradiation of upper neck in N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Methods

From February 1996 to November 2002, 97 patients without cervical lymph node involvement were admitted for radiotherapy alone. Before treatment, each patient underwent enhanced CT of nasopharynx and neck. All patients received radiotherapy to the nasopharynx, skull base, and upper neck drainage areas (including levels II, III, and VA). The upper neck was irradiated to a total dose of 50-56 Gy/25-28 fractions/5-5.6 weeks. For the primary tumor, 22 patients used conventional fractionation for a total dose of 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks, and 75 patients used an accelerated hyperfractionationated schedule for a total dose of 78 Gy/60 fractions/6 weeks.

Results

The median follow-up of these 97 patients was 7.75 years. 10 patients had recurrences in the nasopharynx, 8 had distant metastasis, and 5 had recurrences in the cervical lymph nodes. Among the cervical lymph node failures, the areas of recurrence were in the II drainage areas in 4 patients who had neck dissections afterwards, and in IA drainage areas in 1 patient who also had recurrence in the nasopharynx. The causes of death were recurrence in the nasopharynx for 8 patients, 1 of these also had recurrence in the neck, distant metastases in 8 patients, and non-neoplastic diseases in 3 patients.

Conclusions

The causes of failure of N0 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy alone to the nasopharynx and upper neck were nasopharyngeal recurrence, distant metastasis, and cervical recurrence in order of frequency. Elective irradiation of upper neck (II, III, VA) is advised for stage N0 patients diagnosed by enhanced CT of neck. Cervical recurrence alone is rare, which did not greatly affect the long-term survival after salvage neck dissection.

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Radiotherapy Lymph node

Introduction

Cervical lymph node metastasis is common in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The 5-year survival rate was 50-70% after radiotherapy alone and the major cause of treatment failure is distant metastasis, followed by nasopharyngeal and neck recurrence [13]. Improving the efficacy and reducing the side effects of radiotherapy have been the two goals of all radiation oncologists. As radiation can cause neck fibrosis [3, 4], methods of decreasing neck radiation reaction were studied. Reducing the volume irradiated can markedly improve the quality of life. 18.7-26.5% of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma at initial presentation were stage N0 [57]. Radiation is given to N0 patients either electively to the upper neck (II, III, VA) lymph node drainage area only, or to the whole neck (II, III, VA, IV, VB) [810]. This study is to analyze the pattern of relapse and survival for stage N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma after elective irradiation to the upper neck only.

Materials and methods

Patients eligible for this study were all treated at the Cancer Hospital of Fudan University. The eligibility criteria were: above 18 years old but not more than 70 years old, biopsy proven pathologically as World Health Organization (WHO) type III NPC, stage N0 disease according to AJCC 2002 staging system, KPS≥70, and no evidence of distant metastasis.

Initial evaluation included: medical history and physical examination, liver and renal functions, chest x-ray, liver ultra-sonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the nasopharynx and neck, as well as nasopharyngoscopy. Additional investigations were performed only for those with suspicious findings. Dental extraction if deemed necessary was performed before radiation therapy. The study procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Committee on Human Experimentation of Cancer Center, Fudan University. All patients signed an informed consent before entry into the study.

Patients were immobilized using a thermoplastic mask while receiving radiotherapy and two-dimensional treatment planning system (TPS) was done. The upper neck nodal regions were included in the large facio-cervical fields that were used up to 40 Gy to the primary tumor. Then the primary fields were reduced to smaller pre-auricular fields. To supplement the dose to the upper neck, either a frontal field with Cobalt 60 with middle shielding or direct fields with 9 MeV electrons were used. The upper neck (including levels II, III, and VA) was irradiated to a total dose of 50-56 Gy/25-28 fractions/5-5.6 weeks. Elective Irradiation was not given to the lower neck (IV, VB). For the primary tumor, 22 patients used conventional fractionation for a total dose of 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks, and 75 patients used an accelerated hyperfractionationated schedule for a total dose of 78 Gy/60 fractions/6 weeks, of which 48 Gy was given in 40 fractions using 2 fractions per day, 1.2 Gy/fraction, with an interval of ≥ 6 h, 5 days per week, followed by 30 Gy in 20 fractions using 2 fractions per day, 1.5 Gy/fraction, 5 days per week.

After completion of radiotherapy, patients were followed up every 3 months during the first 2 years, and every 6 months thereafter. In addition to routine checkup, CT scans of nasopharynx and upper neck were performed every year. Post-irradiation toxicities were observed and recorded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria.

Local control, cervical lymph node control, distant metastases and survival rates were calculated from the start of treatment to the dates of recurrence, metastases, and death. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control, distant metastases and survival rates.

Results

This trial included 97 consecutive patients with stage N0, who had pathologically confirmed WHO type III NPC, between February 1996 and November 2002. Among them, there were 70 males and 27 females, and their median age was 50 years (range: 20-70 years). The 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer (AJCC) staging system was used for the classification of the primary lesion which was as follows: T1: 20 patients; T2: 50; T3: 9 and T4: 18. Characteristics of the 97 patients are listed in Table 1. The median follow-up time was 7.75 years (range, 10 months-11.1 years).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

 

Number of patients

%

Age, year

  

   Range

20-70

 

   ≥ 60

23

23.7

   < 60

74

76.3

Gender

  

   Male

70

72.2

   Female

27

27.8

Histology

  

   WHO Type I

0

0

   WHO Type II

0

0

   WHO Type III

97

100

Stage

  

   T1

20

20.6

   T2

50

51.5

   T3

9

9.3

   T4

18

18.6

Five patients developed regional relapse: 2 patients in T1, 2 in T2, and 1 in T4. The 5-year cervical lymph node control rate was 94.3% (Figure 1). Four patients had recurrence in II drainage areas, who underwent salvage neck dissection and achieved long-term survival. One patient failed in IA drainage areas who also had nasopharyngeal recurrence. According to RTOG criteria, the neck fibrosis of all patients was grade 0-1 after radiotherapy.
Figure 1

Five-year cervical lymph node control.

Ten patients developed local recurrence of the primary lesion: 1 in T1, 4 in T2, 2 in T3, and 3 patients in T4. The 5-year local control rate was 91.4%. For T1-2, T3-4, the 5-year local control rates were 95.6% and 80.8%, respectively (P = 0.063) (Figure 2). These ten patients were re-irradiated, and two of them achieved long-term survival.
Figure 2

Five-year local control for T1-2 patients versus T3-4 patients.

A total of 8 patients developed distant metastases: 2 in T1, 3 in T2, and 3 patients in T4. The sites of distant metastases were bone (2 patients), lung (2 patients), and liver (4 patients), The 5-year distant metastasis-free rate was 92.5%.

At the time of this analysis, 78 patients were still alive. The 5-year overall survival rate was 82.3%. For T1-2, T3-4, the 5-year overall survival rate were 87.1%, 69.2%, respectively (P = 0.009) (Figure 3). Causes of death for 19 patients were as follows: 7 patients died of nasopharyngeal recurrence, 1 patient died of both nasopharyngeal and neck recurrence, 8 patients died of distant metastasis, and 3 patients died of non-neoplastic diseases.
Figure 3

Five-year overall survival for T1-2 patients versus T3-4 patients.

Discussion

All stage N0 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in our study who were treated by radiotherapy alone did not receive prophylactic irradiation of lower neck lymph node drainage area, but the radiation fields covered the upper neck lymph drainage region including levels II, III, VA and the primary disease. The regional cervical control rate was 94.3%. Recurrence in four patients appeared in II drainage region and one patient failed in IA region. No recurrence in IV region or supraclavicular lymph nodes was observed. Therefore, it is suggested that irradiation to the upper neck only is adequate. The radiation fields in our patients were similar to patients of Dr. Gao, but our patients were only given radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was not protocolized in all patients of Dr. Gao and was used at the discretion of the attending physician in individual cases, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin and fluorouracil, concurrent and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy [11]. We think that the result of radiotherapy alone would be more persuasive in that it avoided the effect of combined chemotherapy as a confound variable.

Neck lymph node metastasis rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was about 70-80%. Therefore, some researchers proposed irradiation of the whole neck regardless of N staging. Li reported the results of 2523 patients in 1991: if the whole neck was irradiated, cervical lymph nodes recurrence rates in N+, N0 patients were 12% and 11%, respectively. For those N0 patients who did not receive elective node irradiation, the cervical lymph nodes recurrence rate was 38%. And the overall survival rates were 86.6% and 58.8% for patients who have and have not received elective node irradiation, respectively [1214]. Although most researchers including Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) require routine whole neck irradiation regardless of the status of nodal metastasis [15, 16], other researchers recommended that elective radiation of only the upper neck (level II, III, and VA) is sufficient for N0 patients [1315]. Chen studied 432 N0 patients without elective irradiation to the lower neck [13], of whom 17 patients had recurrences in the cervical lymph nodes. The rates in the field, off the field were 0.93%, 1.62% (P = 0.937). The 5-year cervical lymph node control rate was 96.06%. Li investigated 178 N0 patients with NPC [14], the cervical lymph node recurrence rates were 1.14% and 1.08% (p > 0.05) for patients that received radiotherapy to the whole neck or only the upper neck, respectively. Tang did research on N0 patients diagnosed by MRI and the results showed that elective irradiation to the lower neck did not improve efficacy [16]. These results suggested that elective node irradiation to the upper neck (II, III, VA) is advisable for stage N0 patients diagnosed by enhanced CT or MRI examination of neck.

The reason of discrepancy between different researchers may be that some clinically diagnosed N0 patients, in fact, had neck lymph node metastasis. Studies revealed that 20.8- 29.7% clinically N0 patients had cervical lymph node metastasis by imaging examination. Since CT, MRI and PET-CT can affect staging, the advanced imaging technology is undoubtedly necessary [8]. Imaging studies have shown that the spread pattern of neck lymph node has a certain order, rarely skipping in their progression [16, 17]. Tang analyzed 786 nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosed by MRI: retropharyngeal lymph node and II lymph node is the most common metastasis site, followed by III, VA and IV. And supraclavicular lymph nodes are the third station. Neck dissection is an effective treatment for residual or recurrent cervical lymph nodes after radiotherapy [18, 19]. Before radiotherapy, enhanced CT of neck was done in our patients of this group. The 5-year neck recurrence rate was 5.7%. Recurrence sites in four patients appeared in II drainage region and one patient failed in IA region accompanied by nasopharyngeal recurrence. There were no recurrences in IV region or supraclavicular lymph nodes. Four patients failed in cervical lymph node only, but long-term survival was still achieved after neck dissection.

When patients are diagnosed as nasopharyngeal carcinoma, almost 75% already have neck lymph node metastasis. The most common cause of death after radiotherapy is distant metastasis, followed by nasopharyngeal and cervical recurrence [2022]. Many studies confirm that lymph node metastasis is related to distant metastasis [2022]. However, for N0 patients, nasopharyngeal recurrence is most common, followed by distant metastasis and regional recurrence, which is rare [1315]. Li analyzed 178 N0 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: nasopharyngeal recurrence appeared in 29, distant metastasis in 20, and regional recurrence in 2 patients. Chen's analysis of 432 N0 patients showed that the causes of treatment failure were in order of frequency: nasopharyngeal recurrence, distant metastasis, and regional recurrence. In our group, 10 patients had nasopharyngeal recurrence, 8 distant metastasis, and 5 neck recurrence, including 1 patient who had concurrent nasopharyngeal relapse. Therefore, reducing nasopharyngeal recurrence is of great importance for improving the efficacy of radiotherapy.

Neck irradiation not only induced neck fibrosis, but also carotid occlusive diseases including ischemic stroke, ocular ischemic syndrome [23, 24]. Li reported results of 31 patients who underwent carotid duplex sonography (CDS). Significant carotid lesions occurred in 13 of 31 (42%) patients. Stroke was more frequently caused by large artery disease (44% versus 23%; p < 0.01) in NPC patients than in first-ever stroke patients without NPC.

In recent years, many articles have reported that IMRT technology and concomitant chemoradiotherapy can improve nasopharyngeal local control rate and reduce the distant metastasis rate [2528] and that MRI has more advantages than CT for the staging system [29]. However, at the time our patients of this group were treated, these therapies and technologies were not yet available. Whether the order of causes of failure would change should be investigated when these methods are applied to N0 patients.

In summary, the causes of failure of N0 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after elective irradiation of upper neck were in order of frequency nasopharyngeal recurrence, distant metastasis, and regional recurrence. Regional recurrence alone is rare and did not affect significantly the long-term survival after neck dissection. Elective irradiation of upper neck (II, III, VA) irradiation may be advisable for stage N0 patients diagnosed by enhanced CT examination of neck. A prospective randomized Phase III trial of elective radiation including whole neck vs upper neck in N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients is necessary in this new era of IMRT and MRI.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
(2)
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
(3)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Renji Hospital, Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University
(4)

References

  1. Yi JL, Gao L, Huang XD, Li SY, Luo JW, Cai WM, Xiao JP, Xu GZ: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radical radiotherapy alone: ten-year experience of a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 65: 161-168. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. He XY, Liu TF, He SQ, Huan SL, Pan ZQ: Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LCAF). Radiother Oncol 2007, 85: 29-35. 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yeh SA, Tang Y, Lui CC, Huang YJ, Huang EY: Treatment outcomes and late complications of 849 patients with nasopharyngeal cacinoma treated with radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 62: 672-679. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee AW, Ng WT, Hung WM, Choi CW, Tung R, Ling YH, Cheng PT, Yau TK, Chang AT, Leung SK, Lee MC, Bentzen SM: Major late toxicities after conformal radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma-patient-and treatment-related risk factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73: 1121-1128. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.023View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu MZ, Tang LL, Zong JF, Huang Y, Sun Y, Mao YP, Liu LZ, Lin AH, Ma J: Evaluation of sixth edition of AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and proposed improvement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 70: 1115-1123. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2353View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee N, Harris J, Garden AS, Straube W, Glisson B, Xia P, Bosch W, Morrison WH, Quivey J, Thorstad W, Jones C, Ang KK: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group phase IItrial 0225. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27: 3684-3690. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9109PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu XQ, Luo W, Tang YQ, He ZC, Sun Y, Ma J, Lu TX, Liu MZ: A matched cohort analysis of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chinese Journal of cancer 2008, 27: 606-611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grégoire V, Coche E, Cosnard G, Hamoir M, Reychler H: Selection and delineation of lymph node target volume in heard and neck conformal radiotherapy. Proposal for standardizing terminology and procedure based on the surgical experience. Radiother Oncol 2000, 56: 135-150. 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00202-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen SY, Li XM, Li EZ, Wu CQ: The risk factors of cervical lymph node recurrence after radiotherapy for neck negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Radiat Oncol 2001, 10: 4-6.Google Scholar
  10. Song CH, Wu HG, Heo DS, Kim KH, Sung MW, Park CI: Treatment outcomes for radiotherapy alone are comparable with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2008, 118: 663-670. 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181626cfeView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao Y, Zhu G, Lu J, Ying H, Kong L, Wu Y, Hu C: Elective irradiation to the lower neck necessary for N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 77: 1397-1402. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.062View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee AW, Pan RF, Luo ZJ, Chen GJ, Fu HL: Patterns of relapse and results of withholding elective neck irradiation(ENI) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Radiat Oncol 1991, 5: 213-215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen CZ, Li DR, Chen ZJ, Li DS, Guo LJ, Guo H: Long-term efficacy of prophylactic upper neck irradiation for stage N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ai Zheng 2008, 27: 295-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Y, Cao KJ, Chen QY, Xie GF, Huang PY: Radiotherapy on neck for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with negative cervical lymph node. Chinese Journal of cancer 2005, 24: 627-630.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Xie FY, Peng M, Hu WH, Han F, Wang X, Xu HM: Radiotherapy of cervical lymph nodes for the patients with stage-N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chinese Journal of Cancer 2010, 29: 100-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tang L, Mao Y, Liu L, Liang S, Chen Y, Sun Y, Liao X, Lin A, Liu M, Li L, Ma J: The volume to be irradiated during selective neck irradiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma analysis of the spread patterns in lymph nodes by magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2009, 115: 680-688. 10.1002/cncr.24049View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang XS, Hu CS, Wu YR, Qiu XX, Feng Y: Analysis of computed tomography-based distribution of metastatic cervical nodes in 218 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ai Zheng 2004, 23: 1056-1059.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin CY, Tsai ST, Jin YT, Yang MW, Yeh IC, Hsiao JR: Outcome of surgical management of persistent or recurrent neck mass in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008,265(Suppl 1):S69-74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang XN, Chen WK, Pan ZL: Clinical analysis of 23 patients with residual or recurrent node disease after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by salvage operation. The practical journal of cancer 2007, 22: 376-377.Google Scholar
  20. Lee AW, Sze WM, Au JS, Leung SF, Leung TW, Chua DT, Zee BC, Law SC, Teo PM, Tung SY, Kwong DL, Lau WH: Treatment result for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era: the Hong Kong experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 61: 1107-1116. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.702View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao YS, Hu CS, Ying HM, Zhu GP, Kong L, He XY, Xu TT, Wang XS, Yuan J, Wu SQ, Zhang YW, Liu TF: Treatment results of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 1837 cases in a single institute. Chin J Radiat Oncol 2008, 17: 335-339.Google Scholar
  22. Mao YP, Xie FY, Liu LZ, Sun Y, Li L, Tang LL, Liao XB, Xu HY, Chen L, Lai SZ, Lin AH, Liu MZ, Ma J: Re-evaluation of 6th edition of AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma and proposed improvement based on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 73: 1326-1334. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.062View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li CS, Schminke U, Tan TY: Extracranial carotid artery disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with post-irradiation ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010, 112: 682-686. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.05.007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tang Y, Luo D, Peng W, Huang F, Peng Y: Ocular ischemic syndrome secondary to carotid artery occlusion as a late complication of radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Neuroophthalmol 2010, 30: 315-320. 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181dee914View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tham IW, Hee SW, Yeo RM, Salleh PB, Lee J, Tan TW, Fong KW, Chua ET, Wee JT: Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using intensity-modulated radiotherapy-the national cancer centre Singapore experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 75: 1481-1046. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin S, Pan J, Han L, Zhang X, Liao X, Lu JJ: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy: report on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 75: 1071-1078. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kam MK, Teo PM, Chau RM, Cheung KY, Choi PH, Kwan WH, Leung SF, Zee B, Chan AT: Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 60: 1440-1150. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.022View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Afqir S, Ismaili N, Errihani H: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the management of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current status. J Cancer Res Ther 2009, 5: 3-7. 10.4103/0973-1482.48763View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun Y, Mao YP, Ma J, Huang Y, Tang LL, Wang Y, Liu LZ, Lu TX: Influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the staging system of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ai Zheng 2007, 26: 158-163.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© He et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.