Open Access

A new method of lower extremity immobilization in radiotherapy

  • Xuhai Zheng1,
  • Tangzhi Dai1,
  • Xiaochuan Shu1,
  • Yuanxue Pu1,
  • Gang Feng1,
  • Xuesong Li1,
  • Dongbiao Liao1 and
  • Xiaobo Du1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
Radiation Oncology20127:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-27

Received: 24 October 2011

Accepted: 29 February 2012

Published: 29 February 2012

Abstract

We developed a new method for immobilization of the fix lower extremities by using a thermoplastic mask, a carbon fiber base plate, a customized headrest, and an adjustable angle holder. The lower extremities of 11 patients with lower extremity tumors were immobilized by this method. CT simulation was performed for each patient. For all 11 patients, the device fit was suitable and comfortable and had good reproducibility, which was proven in daily radiotherapy.

Keywords

Lower extremity Immobilization Radiotherapy

Background

Many tumors occur in the lower extremities, such as soft tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas, and benign diseases [13]. Most patients with lower extremity tumors opt for radiotherapy because, compared to radical surgery, because multimodal treatments combining conservative surgery and radiation therapy achieves maximize long-term extremity function with excellent local control rates and minimal morbidity [47]. With the development of conformal radiotherapy, particularly the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, practitioners require new lower extremity immobilization methods that provide good reproducibility. No standard method has been established for lower extremity immobilization; most methods involve the use of alpha cradles, ankle casts, customized immobilization devices, or negative pressure vacuum air cushions [8, 9]. We have developed a new method for immobilizing lower extremities with improved reproducibility and patient comfort.

Methods

The Hospital Medical Research Ethics Committee approved our research in accordance with the laws and regulations in China and all the patients gave oral and written informed consent before the start of the study.

Our device includes a thermoplastic mask (Shanghai gray prescribed medical technology Co., LTD, China), a carbon fiber base plate (MedTec,USA), a customized headrest (MedTec,USA), and an adjustable angle holder (MedTec,USA). The thermoplastic mask and adjustable angle holder were remolded before use.

We cut the U-shaped thermoplastic mask (Figure 1A and 1B), removed the rigid plastic on the top, and used the remainder of the mask. We reconstructed the adjustable angle holder by detaching the carbon fiber base plate at the bottom of the holder after removing the 4 screws at the bottom, reversing the position of the plate; and fixing it again (Figure 2A, B, C and 2D). Two screws present on each side of the mask could be manipulated to change the angle for adaptation to the varying leg-bend angles. We fixed the reassembled holder to the carbon fiber base plate and placed a suitable customized headrest on the holder. Finally, we immobilized one lower extremity with the remolded thermoplastic It is important to note that only 1 leg was immobilized while the other leg was bent (Figure 3A, B and 3C).
Figure 1

Ready thermoplastic mask. (A) The original thermoplastic mask for the head. (B) The mask with the rigid plastic on the top cut by us.

Figure 2

Ready adjustable angle holder reconstructed by us. (A) The adjustable angle holder. (B) The carbon fiber base plate at the bottom of the holder was detached by removing the 4 screws on the bottom. (C) The carbon fiber base plate was reversed. (D) The adjustable angle holder was reassembled.

Figure 3

Immobilized lower extremity. (A) The device displayed here is a combination of the following 3 parts: the carbon base plate at the bottom, the reconstructed adjustable angle holder in the middle, and a customized headrest at the top. (B) An example of thigh fixation. (C) An example of crus fixation. (D) An image of a part of our plan system.

The lower extremities of 11 patients with lower extremity tumors were immobilized by this system. CT (General Electric Company, USA) simulation was performed for each patient. For each patient, we created a plan with the Pinnacle plan system (Philips, Holland) and performed X-ray in the anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral views every weekly (Figure 3D).

Results and discussion

The device fit for all 11 patients was suitable and comfortable, which was proven in daily radiotherapy. The mean displacement of the isocenter was 3.3 mm (from 0.4 to 6 mm) in the superior-inferior direction 2.1 mm (from 0.5 to 4 mm) in the AP direction and 1.6 mm (from 0.4 to 3 mm) in the left-right direction. The leg rotation around the isocenter was also determined and found to be negligible.

Radiotherapy plays an essential role in the treatment of lower extremity tumors [47, 10]. In radiation methods for lower extremity tumors, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is reported to have better target coverage than other radiation methods used for lower extremity tumors and it significantly decrease the dose to the organs-at-risk [9, 11]. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy requires better reproducibility, but the lower extremities of patients with lower extremity tumors are difficult to immobilize, because of the tumor or surgical effects. In radiotherapy, immobilization of the lower extremity is achieved using alpha-cradle, ankle casts, customized immobilization devices, or negative pressure vacuum air cushions [810]. We developed a new method for immobilizing the lower leg by using existing materials and devices. With this method, the patients were comfortable and the reproducibility was high. First, the immobilized lower extremity could not move or turn easily, which yielded higher reproducibility. Second, some patients who were surgically treated prior to radiotherapy could not easily straighten their legs, and therefore, they found the adjustable fixation more comfortable. Third, only 1 leg was immobilized while the other leg was bent, making it easier to design treatment plans.

In conclusion, we have developed a new method for immobilizing the lower extremities for radiotherapy.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital
(2)
Department of Oncology, MianYang Central Hospital

References

  1. Cormier JN, Pollock RE: Soft tissue sarcomas. CA Cancer J Clin 2004, 54: 94-109. 10.3322/canjclin.54.2.94View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cotterill SJ, Ahrens S, Paulussen M, et al.: Prognostic factors in Ewing's tumor of bone: analysis of 975 patients from the European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study group. J Clin Oncol 2000, 18: 3108-3114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gurney JG, Swensen AR, Bulterys M: SEER Pediatric Monograph. Available at: . Accessed http://seer.cancer.gov/publications/childhood/bone.pdf Available at: . Accessed
  4. O'Sullivan B, Davis A, Turcotte R, et al.: Five-year results of a randomized phase III trial of pre-operative vs post-operative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 2004, 22: 9007.Google Scholar
  5. Yang JC, Chang AE, Baker AR, et al.: Randomized prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. J Clin Oncol 1998, 16: 197-203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wilson AN, Davis A, Bell RS, et al.: Local control of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: the experience of a multidisciplinary sarcoma group with definitive surgery and radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer 1994, (30A):746-751.Google Scholar
  7. Dunst J, Jurgens H, Sauer R, et al.: Radiation therapy in Ewing's sarcoma: an update of the CESS 86 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 32: 919-930. 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00016-RView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Halperin Edward C, Perez Carlos A, Brady Luther W: Perez and Brady's Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 5th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:1816.Google Scholar
  9. Stewart AJ, Lee YK, Saran FH: Comparison of conventional radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for post-operative radiotherapy for primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2009, 93: 125-130. 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis A, O'Sullivan B, Bell R, et al.: Function and health status outcomes in a randomized trial comparing preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20: 4472-4477. 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.084View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong L, Alektiar KM, Hunt M, Venkatraman E, Leibel SA: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 59: 752-759. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.11.037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zheng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement